Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

The funding conversation we left unfinished

web

Author

jenn

Credibility Rating

3/5
Good(3)

Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.

Rating inherited from publication venue: EA Forum

An EA Forum reflective piece critiquing incomplete discourse around funding decisions within the effective altruism ecosystem, relevant to understanding how AI safety organizations compete for and receive resources.

Forum Post Details

Karma
211
Comments
53
Forum
eaforum
Forum Tags
CommunityBuilding effective altruismEffective altruism funding

Metadata

Importance: 38/100blog postcommentary

Summary

This EA Forum post examines gaps and unresolved tensions in how the effective altruism community discusses and allocates funding, particularly around AI safety and existential risk priorities. It argues that important structural and strategic funding questions have been sidestepped or left incomplete in community discourse.

Key Points

  • The EA community has avoided fully resolving key debates about how funding should be prioritized across cause areas, including AI safety.
  • Incomplete funding conversations can lead to misaligned incentives and suboptimal resource allocation across organizations.
  • The post calls for more transparent and rigorous discussion about funding strategies, including who decides and on what basis.
  • Structural power dynamics within EA funding ecosystems may discourage honest critique or alternative approaches.
  • Better meta-level coordination on funding could improve the overall effectiveness of AI safety and existential risk work.

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
Lionheart VenturesOrganization50.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 15, 202638 KB
The funding conversation we left unfinished — EA Forum 
 
 This website requires javascript to properly function. Consider activating javascript to get access to all site functionality. The funding conversation we left unfinished 

 by jenn Dec 10 2025 3 min read 53 211

 Community Building effective altruism Effective altruism funding Frontpage People working in the AI industry are making stupid amounts of money, and word on the street is that Anthropic is going to have some sort of liquidity event soon (for example possibly IPOing sometime next year ). A lot of people working in AI are familiar with EA, and are intending to direct donations our way (if they haven't started already). People are starting to discuss what this might mean for their own personal donations and for the ecosystem , and this is encouraging to see.

 It also has me thinking about 2022. Immediately before the FTX collapse, we were just starting to reckon, as a community, with the pretty significant vibe shift in EA that came from having a lot more money to throw around.

 CitizenTen, in " The Vultures Are Circling " (April 2022), puts it this way:

 The message is out. There’s easy money to be had. And the vultures are coming. On many internet circles, there’s been a worrying tone. “You should apply for [insert EA grant], all I had to do was pretend to care about x, and I got $$!” Or, “I’m not even an EA, but I can pretend, as getting a 10k grant is a good instrumental goal towards [insert-poor-life-goals-here]” Or, “Did you hear that a 16 year old got x amount of money? That’s ridiculous! I thought EA’s were supposed to be effective!” Or, “All you have to do is mouth the words community building and you get thrown bags of money.” 

 Basically, the sharp increase in rewards has led the number of people who are optimizing for the wrong thing to go up. Hello Goodhart . Instead of the intrinsically motivated EA, we’re beginning to get the resume padders, the career optimizers, and the type of person that cheats on the entry test for preschool in the hopes of getting their child into a better college. I’ve already heard of discord servers springing up centered around gaming the admission process for grants. And it’s not without reason. The Atlas Fellowship is offering a 50k, no strings attached scholarship. If you want people to throw out any hesitation around cheating the system, having a carrot that’s larger than most adult’s yearly income will do that.

 Other highly upvoted posts from that era:

 I feel anxious that there is all this money around. Let's talk about it - Nathan Young, March 2022
 Free-spending EA might be a big problem for optics and epistemics - George Rosenfield, April 2022
 EA and the current funding situation - Will MacAskill, May 2022
 The biggest risk of free-spending EA is not optics or motivated cognition, but grift - Ben Kuhn, May 2022
 Bad Omens in Current Community Building - Theo Hawking, May 2022
 The EA movement’s values are drifting.

... (truncated, 38 KB total)
Resource ID: 0b81b12f093efc36 | Stable ID: MGI1MzJlMj