Back
What Works and What Doesn't: The Hewlett Foundation's Transparency - Harder & Co.
webTangentially relevant to AI safety governance insofar as transparent evaluation practices and sharing negative results are principles applicable to AI auditing and accountability frameworks, but this resource is primarily focused on philanthropic evaluation methodology.
Metadata
Importance: 18/100organizational reportcommentary
Summary
This resource examines the Hewlett Foundation's approach to openly sharing evaluation results, including both successes and failures of their funded programs. It explores the rationale, challenges, and benefits of transparent evaluation practices in philanthropy as a model for organizational learning and accountability.
Key Points
- •The Hewlett Foundation publicly shares evaluation findings, including negative results, as a commitment to transparency and learning.
- •Transparent sharing of evaluation results can improve sector-wide knowledge and reduce duplication of ineffective approaches.
- •Organizations face cultural and reputational barriers to sharing what doesn't work, making such transparency uncommon.
- •Open evaluation practices can build trust with stakeholders and encourage a culture of honest reflection and improvement.
- •The piece offers lessons applicable to any organization seeking to institutionalize rigorous, transparent evaluation.
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| William and Flora Hewlett Foundation | Organization | 55.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Mar 15, 20264 KB
What Works and What Doesn’t: The Hewlett Foundation’s Transparency in Sharing Evaluation Results - Harder+Company Community Research
You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
One of the best parts of our work is getting to be a thought partner with clients. As social impact consultants, we’re always eager to help organizations take a closer look at their work and learn more about what is and isn’t working.
As part of a recent project with the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation , we did just that. The Foundation’s Effective Philanthropy Group hired us to evaluate its Knowledge Creation and Dissemination strategy, which seeks to inform, influence, and improve philanthropic approaches and decision-making.
Our focus for this evaluation was pretty simple: Identify what aspects of the strategy might be more or less effective and help inform the Hewlett Foundation’s future investments in this area. Much of what we found showed that this strategy is leading to important contributions in the field. But the Foundation wasn’t content just to tout those successes. Instead, the Hewlett Foundation recently posted an amazing summary of the strategy’s evolution—including some key findings from our evaluation—on its blog . The Effective Philanthropy Group noted what has worked over the years and, more importantly, what hasn’t. The Foundation states clearly, “We believe it is important to share openly about this strategy that didn’t bear out as we expected.”
Take a look at the video they produced, below. (It features our very own Paul Harder among others!) And you can find the full version of our evaluation report for the Hewlett Foundation on their website .
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
Archive
2024 October
2022 February
2021 June
January
2020 August
May
April
February
2019 November
June
May
April
March
February
January
2018 October
August
July
June
May
April
March
January
2017 December
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
2016 December
November
October
September
August
June
April
March
January
2015 December
October
September
June
May
2014 December
April
2013 December
Authors
Alex Aguirre
Anna Cruz
Aimée Fribourg
Amy Goldman
Ana Quiroz
Allison Wolp
... (truncated, 4 KB total)Resource ID:
0e1d095bf834171d | Stable ID: Mjc1M2UxMW