Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

over 200 million AI-powered surveillance cameras

web

Relevant as a corrective to inflated narratives about AI-enabled social control; useful for grounding governance discussions about real versus imagined AI surveillance risks, though peripheral to core technical AI safety topics.

Metadata

Importance: 28/100organizational reportcommentary

Summary

MERICS analyst Vincent Brussee debunks the widespread myth of a unified AI-driven social credit score in China, arguing the actual system is fragmented, low-tech, and business-focused. He cautions that the bogeyman narrative distracts from more legitimate surveillance concerns, both in China and globally.

Key Points

  • No unified citizen 'social credit score' exists in China; the system is fragmented, poorly digitalized, and primarily targets businesses.
  • The myth likely originates from tangentially related private initiatives like Alibaba's Sesame Credit, which was denied an official credit license.
  • China's actual surveillance concerns are elsewhere: over 200 million AI-powered cameras and other invasive practices deserve more scrutiny.
  • Scoring pilots in some Chinese cities became controversial even domestically and were largely discontinued.
  • Misrepresentation of China's SoCS risks misdirecting AI governance policy debates away from real surveillance threats.

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
AI Value Lock-inRisk64.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 20, 202610 KB
[Skip to main content](https://merics.org/en/comment/chinas-social-credit-score-untangling-myth-reality#main-content)

![People Crossing Street in Beijing](https://merics.org/sites/default/files/styles/multiple_content_types_default/public/2022-02/264643849.jpg?h=efbf3989&itok=1jUUCXZF)

[Share this Article](https://merics.org/en/node/share-popup/1461)

Comment

Feb 11, 2022






5 min read





# China’s social credit score – untangling myth from reality

**The idea that China gives every citizen a “social credit score” continues to capture the horrified imagination of many. But it is more bogeyman than reality. Instead, we should be worrying about other, more invasive surveillance practices – and not just in China, argues MERICS analyst Vincent Brussee.**

“What if every action that you took in your life was recorded in a score like it was a video game?” … “If your score drops to 950, you will be subject to re-education.” … “It is the beginning of slavery, complete control, and the disappearance of all freedoms ... In China, they call it social credit.” These are just some of the statements made in parliamentary debates in Europe and online commentaries about China’s Social Credit System. Given the vehemence of these views, and the attention they attract, it must have come as a real headscratcher to many when China recently [pledged](https://www.politico.eu/article/china-artificial-intelligence-ai-ban-social-scoring-united-nations-unesco-ethical-ai/ "(opens in a new window)") that would ban the use of AI for social scoring.

So, what are the facts relating to China’s Social Credit System (SoCS)? First, a system does exist, but it is very different from what is imagined by many critics outside China. The biggest disconnect is around the notion of scores. Some commentators seem to imagine that a magic algorithm draws from AI cameras and internet surveillance all over the country to calculate a score that determines everyone’s place in society. In reality, the SoCS is not the techno-dystopian nightmare we fear: it is [lowly digitalized, highly fragmented, and primarily focuses on businesses](https://merics.org/en/report/chinas-social-credit-system-2021-fragmentation-towards-integration). Most importantly, such a score simply does not exist.

[![A quick guide to the Social Credit System](https://merics.org/sites/default/files/styles/pt_media_image_850_2x/public/2022-02/220126%20SoCS%20mythbusting%20table%20%283%291024_1.jpg?itok=0hROKlsF)](https://merics.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/220126%20SoCS%20mythbusting%20table%20%283%291024_1.jpg "")

Yet the myth still persists - even governments that acknowledge the complexities of the SoCS still express [concerns](https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/kamervragen/detail?id=2021Z13647&did=2021D37045 "(opens in a new window)")  about scoring and how it could be developed in the future. So, what is behind the idea of social credit scoring?

## Provenance and early attempts

The SoCS, which first emerg

... (truncated, 10 KB total)
Resource ID: 3e03a6e800128f8c | Stable ID: ZDEyZGIzZj