Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Author

William_MacAskill

Credibility Rating

3/5
Good(3)

Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.

Rating inherited from publication venue: EA Forum

Written days after FTX's collapse in November 2022, this statement is a key primary source documenting the EA leadership's immediate response to the scandal and its implications for EA's ethical credibility and governance norms.

Forum Post Details

Karma
291
Comments
144
Forum
eaforum
Forum Tags
CommunityPhilosophyFTX collapseFTX FoundationFuture FundNaive vs. sophisticated consequentialismSam Bankman-FriedWilliam MacAskill

Metadata

Importance: 62/100opinion pieceprimary source

Summary

William MacAskill publicly condemns the actions behind FTX's collapse, expressing outrage and shame over Sam Bankman-Fried's alleged misuse of customer funds. He argues that if fraud occurred, it represents a betrayal of EA's core principles of integrity and honesty, and warns against 'ends justify the means' reasoning that may have enabled such behavior.

Key Points

  • MacAskill states it is more likely than not that FTX senior leadership used customer deposits to bail out Alameda Research in violation of their terms of service.
  • He expresses both rage at those responsible and personal shame for having trusted SBF and potentially lending goodwill that 'laundered fraud'.
  • MacAskill emphasizes that fraud would represent a complete abandonment of EA principles, which have long stressed integrity, honesty, and respect for common-sense moral constraints.
  • He explicitly warns against 'ends justify the means' reasoning, noting that believing oneself to be an exception to ethical norms is self-deception.
  • He calls for community-wide reflection on how such deception could occur and how to prevent similar failures in the future.

Cited by 1 page

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 15, 202688 KB
A personal statement on FTX — EA Forum 
 
 This website requires javascript to properly function. Consider activating javascript to get access to all site functionality. A personal statement on FTX 

 by William_MacAskill Nov 12 2022 3 min read 144 291

 Community Philosophy FTX collapse FTX Foundation Future Fund Naive vs. sophisticated consequentialism Sam Bankman-Fried William MacAskill Frontpage This is a repost from a Twitter thread I made last night. It reads a little oddly when presented as a Forum post, but I wanted to have the content shared here for those not on Twitter. 

 This is a thread of my thoughts and feelings about the actions that led to FTX’s bankruptcy, and the enormous harm that was caused as a result, involving the likely loss of many thousands of innocent people’s savings.

 Based on publicly available information, it seems to me more likely than not that senior leadership at FTX used customer deposits to bail out Alameda, despite terms of service prohibiting this, and a (later deleted) tweet from Sam claiming customer deposits are never invested.

 Some places making the case for this view include this article from Wall Street Journal , this tweet from jonwu.eth ,   this article from Bloomberg (and follow on articles).

 I am not certain that this is what happened. I haven’t been in contact with anyone at FTX (other than those at Future Fund), except a short email to resign from my unpaid advisor role at Future Fund. If new information vindicates FTX, I will change my view and offer an apology.

 But if there was deception and misuse of funds, I am outraged, and I don’t know which emotion is stronger: my utter rage at Sam (and others?) for causing such harm to so many people, or my sadness and self-hatred for falling for this deception.

 I want to make it utterly clear: if those involved deceived others and engaged in fraud (whether illegal or not) that may cost many thousands of people their savings, they entirely abandoned the principles of the effective altruism community.

 If this is what happened, then I cannot in words convey how strongly I condemn what they did. I had put my trust in Sam, and if he lied and misused customer funds he betrayed me, just as he betrayed his customers, his employees, his investors, & the communities he was a part of.

 For years, the EA community has emphasised the importance of integrity, honesty, and the respect of common-sense moral constraints. If customer funds were misused, then Sam did not listen; he must have thought he was above such considerations.

 A clear-thinking EA should strongly oppose “ends justify the means” reasoning. I hope to write more soon about this. In the meantime, here are some links to writings produced over the years.

 These are some relevant sections from What We Owe The Future:

 
 

 

 

 Here is Toby Ord in The Precipice:

 

 Here is Holden Karnofsky:  https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/T975ydo3mx8onH3iS/ea-is-about-maximization-and-maximiza

... (truncated, 88 KB total)
Resource ID: 57e18da7164b8408 | Stable ID: ZThkZTlhMD