Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Credibility Rating

4/5
High(4)

High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.

Rating inherited from publication venue: Pew Research Center

Useful for understanding the gap between expert and public perception of AI risks and governance needs; relevant for researchers and policymakers working on AI communication, public trust, and regulatory design.

Metadata

Importance: 52/100organizational reportdataset

Summary

A large-scale Pew Research Center survey comparing AI experts' and U.S. public attitudes toward AI's risks, opportunities, and regulation. The study reveals significant gaps between expert and public sentiment, with experts generally more optimistic while the public expresses greater concern. Key topics include AI's societal impact, desired regulatory frameworks, and expectations about AI's transformative potential.

Key Points

  • AI experts tend to be more excited and optimistic about AI's potential benefits than the general U.S. public, who lean more toward concern.
  • Both experts and the public broadly support some form of AI regulation, though they differ on scope, urgency, and preferred mechanisms.
  • The public shows heightened concern about AI's effects on employment, privacy, and misinformation compared to expert respondents.
  • Experts are more likely to anticipate major positive breakthroughs (e.g., medical, scientific) from AI within the next decade.
  • The survey highlights a significant knowledge and perception gap between AI-informed communities and the broader public on key safety and governance issues.

Review

The Pew Research AI Survey 2025 provides a nuanced exploration of the growing divide between AI experts and the general public regarding artificial intelligence's potential and challenges. While AI experts are significantly more optimistic, with 47% being more excited than concerned about AI's increased use, only 11% of U.S. adults share this sentiment. Conversely, 51% of the public express more concern than excitement about AI's development. The survey delves into critical areas of divergence, including job displacement, human connection, and AI's potential to outperform humans in various tasks. Notably, experts are more confident in AI's capabilities, with 51% believing AI could drive better than humans, compared to just 19% of the public. The research also highlights important concerns about representation, bias, and the need for responsible AI development, with both experts and the public calling for more diverse perspectives in AI design and robust government regulation.

Cited by 2 pages

Resource ID: 5f14da1ccd4f1678 | Stable ID: ZmFiOGE4ZG