letter to Sam Altman
webCredibility Rating
High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.
Rating inherited from publication venue: The Washington Post
Primary source congressional oversight document relevant to AI governance, whistleblower protections, and the tension between corporate NDA practices and public safety accountability at leading AI labs like OpenAI.
Metadata
Summary
A U.S. Senator's August 2024 letter to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman demanding information about allegedly illegal non-disclosure agreements that may prevent employees from reporting AI safety concerns to regulators. The letter references SEC whistleblower complaints and Washington Post reporting on OpenAI's rushed GPT-4o safety testing, requesting records on NDA changes, employee disclosure requests, and SEC investigations by August 15, 2024.
Key Points
- •OpenAI whistleblowers filed an SEC complaint alleging use of illegally restrictive NDAs preventing protected disclosures to government regulators.
- •OpenAI employees reportedly 'squeezed' and 'skirted' safety protocols for GPT-4o launch to meet a self-imposed May 2024 deadline.
- •OpenAI employees issued an open letter in June 2024 demanding AI companies exempt staff from NDAs to allow safety warnings to regulators.
- •The letter demands OpenAI provide copies of updated NDA agreements, records of employee disclosure requests, and details of SEC investigations.
- •Congress is asserting oversight authority over OpenAI's internal safety protocols and employment agreements restricting whistleblowing.
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| AI Lab Safety Culture | Approach | 62.0 |
Cached Content Preview
August 1, 2024
# VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
Mr. Sam Altman Chief Executive Officer OpenAI
Dear Mr. Altman:
OpenAI whistleblowers filed a complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleging, among other allegations, the use of “illegally restrictive non-disclosure agreements (‘NDAs’).”1 I recently obtained a copy of a letter sent by these whistleblowers to SEC Chairman Gary Gensler referencing this complaint and raising several concerns with OpenAI’s employment, severance, non-disparagement, and nondisclosure agreements.2 I am concerned these agreements may be stifling your employees from making protected disclosures to government regulators.
For over a decade, I’ve sounded the alarm about restrictive NDAs that hinder oversight and improperly silence employees from making protected disclosures.3 On June 4, 2024, OpenAI employees issued an open letter demanding AI companies exempt employees from their NDAs, allowing them to warn regulators and the public about potential safety risks of AI.4 Recently, two Washington Post articles highlighted the harms of restrictive NDAs in the AI sector, specifically at OpenAI.5 On July 12, 2024, the Washington Post reported that OpenAI’s safety team sped through testing protocols, “designed to prevent the technology \[GPT-4o\] from causing catastrophic harm,” to meet a self-imposed May launch date.6 Specifically, the article discussed risks with the company’s self-policing of safety.7 Though OpenAI stated it launched a Safety Advisory Group and Superalignment team to address “catastrophic risks,” the article quoted multiple employees admitting OpenAI “squeezed” and “skirted” safety protocols for its GPT-4o launch.8 According to the article, this incident prompted several current and former OpenAI employees to speak out.9 On July 13, 2024, the Washington Post published another article entitled, “OpenAI illegally barred staff from airing safety risks, whistleblowers say.”10
It is crucial OpenAI ensure its employees can provide protected disclosures without illegal restrictions. On July 19, 2024, as well as July 29, 2024, my staff spoke with yours and requested records. So Congress may conduct objective and independent oversight on OpenAI’s safety protocols and NDAs, please provide answers to the following no later than August 15, 2024:
1. Regarding OpenAI’s employment, severance, non-disparagement, and non-disclosure agreements, has OpenAI made changes to the language of the agreements to remove the restrictive provisions? If so, provide a copy of the updated version(s).
2. From 2023 to the date of this letter, how many requests did OpenAI receive from employees to disclose information to federal authorities? For each request, provide all records, including the relevant federal authorities, the nature of the information to be disclosed, and whether OpenAI permitted the disclosure.
3. From 2023 to the date of this letter, how many SEC investigations has OpenAI been subject to? For each SEC in
... (truncated, 3 KB total)67cbb636aee227a3 | Stable ID: MjgyZTc1M2