Back
Big Tech controls 66% of cloud computing
webeconomic-policy.org·economic-policy.org/79th-economic-policy-panel/ai-monopol...
Relevant to AI safety governance discussions around concentration of AI power; complements concerns about single points of failure and the structural conditions enabling or preventing diverse AI development ecosystems.
Metadata
Importance: 62/100organizational reportanalysis
Summary
A study by Anton Korinek and Jai Vipra for Economic Policy journal warns that generative AI markets are becoming extremely concentrated due to high computational costs and data barriers, with Big Tech firms holding structural advantages. The authors argue that vertical integration incentives and regulatory capture risks could lead to a small number of firms controlling critical AI infrastructure, with consequences for inequality and systemic fragility.
Key Points
- •Training costs for frontier AI models double every six months, making cutting-edge development accessible only to the most well-resourced firms.
- •Big Tech controls 66% of cloud computing and holds proprietary data advantages; 79% of major US news sites have blocked OpenAI's web crawlers.
- •Vertical integration across chips, data, models, and applications creates compounding barriers to entry and antitrust concerns.
- •Regulatory capture risk: AI monopolies may become powerful enough to shape their own regulatory environment to their advantage.
- •Authors recommend antitrust scrutiny of acquisitions, non-discrimination requirements for AI access, and leveling liability standards across AI and non-AI providers.
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| AI Value Lock-in | Risk | 64.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Mar 20, 20266 KB
## AI monopolies
**New report warns of the economic and social threats from dominant firms in generative artificial intelligence**



The market for the most advanced models of generative artificial intelligence (AI) may become extremely concentrated, due to the high costs of computational resources and the vast quantities of data required for training. That is the one of the central findings of a new study by **Anton Korinek** and **Jai Vipra**, prepared for the journal _Economic Policy_.
The researchers are also concerned that generative AI firms will face increasingly strong incentives to integrate vertically with providers of AI building blocks – such as microchips and data – and with providers of consumer products that use AI. They conclude that in the absence of clear antitrust rules and other regulatory actions, market concentration in generative AI could lead to systemic risks and stark inequality.
One major barrier to entry in the generative AI market is the immense computational power required to train the models. For example, a research team at Epoch estimates that Google’s DeepMind spent an astonishing $650 million to train its Gemini model. What’s more, they estimate that the cost of training the most cutting-edge frontier AI models is doubling every six months.
This computational intensity helps to explain the skyrocketing market capitalisation of firms such as Nvidia, which provide the specialised hardware required for AI training. In addition, it ensures that developing the most capable AI models is out of reach for all but the most well resourced technology companies.
Generative AI also requires vast amounts of data for training. But late entrants to the market are running out of freely available online data – and many websites now take measures to block AI companies from using their content for training purposes.
It’s estimated that 79% of major US news sites have already blocked OpenAI’s web crawlers. This dynamic gives Big Tech platforms like Google, Microsoft and Meta – which already control huge proprietary datasets – a competitive advantage as they can use their data troves to feed their generative AI while newer entrants face restrictions.
The researchers recommend particular antitrust scrutiny of vertical integration, including acquisitions of start-ups by Big Tech (recall Microsoft’s recent controversial investment in French AI newcomer, Mistral). As generative AI starts being used in more diverse economic applications and resembling an essential service like electricity, non-discrimination requirements will be needed so that private monopoly providers cannot arbitrarily determine who has access to the technology and w
... (truncated, 6 KB total)Resource ID:
68f55036318d827b | Stable ID: ZDgxY2M5Nj