An update on our general capability evaluations - METR
webCredibility Rating
4/5
High(4)High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.
Rating inherited from publication venue: METR
Metadata
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Alignment Research Center (ARC) | Organization | 57.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched May 31, 202616 KB
An update on our general capability evaluations - METR
Our Work
Research
Notes
Updates
Risk Assessment
About
Donate
Careers
Search
-->
Our Work
Research
Notes
Updates
Risk Assessment
About
Donate
Careers
Menu
×
An update on our general capability evaluations
CONTRIBUTORS
Beth Barnes
DATE
August 6, 2024
SHARE
Copy Link
Citation
BibTeX Citation
×
@misc { metr-2024-update-on-evaluations ,
title = {An update on our general capability evaluations} ,
author = {Beth Barnes} ,
howpublished = {\url{https://metr.org/blog/2024-08-06-update-on-evaluations/}} ,
year = {2024} ,
month = {08} ,
}
Copy
Since releasing our autonomy evaluation resources , METR has primarily focused on developing better measures of AI capabilities. We are currently developing evaluations for AI R&D capabilities that may serve as “red lines”, 1 as well as a continuous measure of autonomous capabilities in general. In this update, we’ll talk about our recent efforts on developing evaluations for general autonomous capabilities – we plan on providing an update on our AI R&D evaluations in the near future. Note that this post provides an intermediate research update for those interested in our work and includes preliminary results that should not be considered definitive.
Why not focus solely on “red line” evaluations for specific threat models? Unlike the ability to develop bioweapons or execute high-value cyberattacks, possessing autonomy “in general” doesn’t directly enable an AI system to cause catastrophically bad outcomes. However, we still think that it’s worth developing more general measures of autonomous capabilities for several reasons:
Autonomy is a proxy for the extent to which an AI system can have far reaching impacts on the world, with minimal human involvement. We believe that such a metric might be robustly useful across a variety of threat models.
One of our goals for evaluations is to assist with forecasting the capabilities or impacts of AI systems. For this, we expect a general capability measure that provides signal at various scales to be more useful than evaluations that contain only hard tasks more dir
... (truncated, 16 KB total)Resource ID:
81cf326834f21a67 | Stable ID: sid_lfTI2FIzkg