Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Kevin Esvelt warnings

paper

Authors

Kevin Davies·Kevin Esvelt

Credibility Rating

5/5
Gold(5)

Gold standard. Rigorous peer review, high editorial standards, and strong institutional reputation.

Rating inherited from publication venue: Nature

A Nature Biotechnology journal article discussing Kevin Esvelt's research and warnings on biosafety and dual-use research concerns, relevant to AI safety's broader consideration of dual-use technology risks and responsible disclosure practices.

Paper Details

Citations
3
Year
2018
Methodology
peer-reviewed
Categories
The CRISPR Journal

Metadata

journal articleprimary source

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
AI Misuse Risk CruxesCrux65.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 15, 202649 KB
Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2022 | Nature Biotechnology 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 

 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 Skip to main content 

 
 
 
 Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
 the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
 Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
 and JavaScript.

 
 

 

 

 
 
 

 
 
 Advertisement

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2022
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Download PDF 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Download PDF 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 Monoclonal antibodies as a group continue to lead biopharmaceuticals in numbers of approvals and sales, although COVID-19 vaccines shot to the top of the list of highest-grossing individual products.

 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 The past few years will forever be remembered as the years of a pandemic, the likes of which had not been seen for a century. And biopharmaceuticals took a starring role, with both COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics dominating the news for the speed with which they were developed and their impact on global health. Nonetheless, regulatory agencies in both the United States and EU maintained the fast pace of prior years in moving products through their pipelines. This article is the latest survey of biopharmaceutical approvals, which we conduct every four years. The current survey period (January 2018–June 2022) witnessed the approval of 197 biopharmaceutical products (see Box 1 for definition) in the United States and/or EU, when counted by product trade name. Some products contain identical active ingredients or are sold under different trade names in the two regions; taking this into account, 180 distinct biopharmaceutical active ingredients entered the market.

 Box 1 Biopharmaceuticals defined

 Biopharmaceuticals (Table 1 ) are defined here as recombinant proteins, including recombinant antibodies, and nucleic acid- and genetically engineered cell-based products. They are listed in Table 1 consecutively from the most recent approval in each class, with registrations since 2018 indicated with boldface and withdrawals and discontinuations with italics. Eight categories are shown: recombinant clotting factors; recombinant thrombolytics, anticoagulants and other blood-related products; recombinant hormones; recombinant growth factors; recombinant interferons, interleukins and tumor necrosis factor; vaccines; monoclonal-antibody-based products; and other recombinant products. Where more than one drug in the same category was approved in

... (truncated, 49 KB total)
Resource ID: 8d846d942ebf47da | Stable ID: Mjc2ZDE2Yz