Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

PMC Article on Good Judgment Project Data

paper

Credibility Rating

4/5
High(4)

High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.

Rating inherited from publication venue: PubMed Central

Relevant to AI safety researchers interested in using structured human forecasting and superforecaster methodologies to evaluate uncertain outcomes, including AI risk timelines and policy effectiveness.

Metadata

Importance: 42/100journal articleanalysis

Summary

This paper analyzes data from the Good Judgment Project to examine the reliability and accuracy of human forecasting, particularly from 'superforecasters' who consistently outperform others. It investigates the cognitive and methodological factors that contribute to superior probabilistic prediction, with implications for how structured human judgment can inform decision-making under uncertainty.

Key Points

  • Superforecasters from the Good Judgment Project demonstrate consistently superior accuracy in probabilistic forecasting compared to general forecasters and experts.
  • The study examines cognitive traits, updating behaviors, and aggregation methods that distinguish high-performing forecasters.
  • Findings suggest that structured forecasting methodologies can meaningfully improve prediction quality for complex real-world questions.
  • Results have implications for using human forecasting to evaluate AI risks, policy outcomes, and other hard-to-quantify uncertainties.
  • The paper contributes empirical evidence for the value of calibrated uncertainty estimation in high-stakes decision-making contexts.

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
Good Judgment (Forecasting)Organization50.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 15, 202647 KB
Compromising improves forecasting - PMC
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 Skip to main content
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Official websites use .gov 
 

 A
 .gov website belongs to an official
 government organization in the United States.
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 
 

 A lock (
 
 
 Lock 
 
 Locked padlock icon
 
 
 
 ) or https:// means you've safely
 connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
 information only on official, secure websites.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Search PMC Full-Text Archive 
 
 
 
 
 Search in PMC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Journal List
 
 
 

 
 
 
 User Guide
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 PERMALINK

 
 
 
 
 Copy 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
 the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.

 Learn more:
 PMC Disclaimer 
 |
 
 PMC Copyright Notice
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 R Soc Open Sci . 2023 May 17;10(5):221216. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221216 
 
 
 Compromising improves forecasting

 
 Dardo N Ferreiro 
 Dardo N Ferreiro 

 
 
 1 
 Faculty of General Psychology and Education, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany 
 
 
 4 
 Division of Neurobiology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany 
 Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing 
 Find articles by Dardo N Ferreiro 
 
 
 1, 4, ✉ , Ophelia Deroy 
 Ophelia Deroy 

 
 
 2 
 Munich Center for Neuroscience, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany 
 
 
 3 
 Faculty of Philosophy and Philosophy and Science, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany 
 
 
 5 
 Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London, UK 
 Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing 
 Find articles by Ophelia Deroy 
 
 
 2, 3, 5 , Bahador Bahrami 
 Bahador Bahrami 

 
 
 1 
 Faculty of General Psychology and Education, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany 
 
 
 6 
 Centre for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany 
 Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing 
 Find articles by Bahador Bahrami 
 
 
 1, 6 
 
 
 Author information 

 Article notes 

 Copyright and License information 

 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 Faculty of General Psychology and Education, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany 
 
 
 2 
 Munich Center for Neuroscience, Lud

... (truncated, 47 KB total)
Resource ID: 991a4432c9aa08fb | Stable ID: ZmYyOTE4Nm