PMC Article on Good Judgment Project Data
paperCredibility Rating
High quality. Established institution or organization with editorial oversight and accountability.
Rating inherited from publication venue: PubMed Central
Relevant to AI safety researchers interested in using structured human forecasting and superforecaster methodologies to evaluate uncertain outcomes, including AI risk timelines and policy effectiveness.
Metadata
Summary
This paper analyzes data from the Good Judgment Project to examine the reliability and accuracy of human forecasting, particularly from 'superforecasters' who consistently outperform others. It investigates the cognitive and methodological factors that contribute to superior probabilistic prediction, with implications for how structured human judgment can inform decision-making under uncertainty.
Key Points
- •Superforecasters from the Good Judgment Project demonstrate consistently superior accuracy in probabilistic forecasting compared to general forecasters and experts.
- •The study examines cognitive traits, updating behaviors, and aggregation methods that distinguish high-performing forecasters.
- •Findings suggest that structured forecasting methodologies can meaningfully improve prediction quality for complex real-world questions.
- •Results have implications for using human forecasting to evaluate AI risks, policy outcomes, and other hard-to-quantify uncertainties.
- •The paper contributes empirical evidence for the value of calibrated uncertainty estimation in high-stakes decision-making contexts.
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Good Judgment (Forecasting) | Organization | 50.0 |
Cached Content Preview
Compromising improves forecasting - PMC
Skip to main content
Official websites use .gov
A
.gov website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
Lock
Locked padlock icon
) or https:// means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.
Search PMC Full-Text Archive
Search in PMC
Journal List
User Guide
PERMALINK
Copy
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
|
PMC Copyright Notice
R Soc Open Sci . 2023 May 17;10(5):221216. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221216
Compromising improves forecasting
Dardo N Ferreiro
Dardo N Ferreiro
1
Faculty of General Psychology and Education, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
4
Division of Neurobiology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilian University, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by Dardo N Ferreiro
1, 4, ✉ , Ophelia Deroy
Ophelia Deroy
2
Munich Center for Neuroscience, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
3
Faculty of Philosophy and Philosophy and Science, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
5
Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London, London, UK
Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by Ophelia Deroy
2, 3, 5 , Bahador Bahrami
Bahador Bahrami
1
Faculty of General Psychology and Education, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
6
Centre for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by Bahador Bahrami
1, 6
Author information
Article notes
Copyright and License information
1
Faculty of General Psychology and Education, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
2
Munich Center for Neuroscience, Lud
... (truncated, 47 KB total)991a4432c9aa08fb | Stable ID: ZmYyOTE4Nm