Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Oliver Habryka on OpenPhil and GoodVentures - EA Forum

blog

Author

TimothyTelleenLawton

Credibility Rating

3/5
Good(3)

Good quality. Reputable source with community review or editorial standards, but less rigorous than peer-reviewed venues.

Rating inherited from publication venue: EA Forum

Relevant to understanding constraints on AI safety funding flows; represents one insider perspective on Open Philanthropy's grantmaking dynamics, though notably one-sided and disputed by Open Phil's written response.

Forum Post Details

Karma
34
Comments
1
Forum
eaforum
Forum Tags
CommunityBuilding effective altruismCoefficient GivingCriticism of effective altruist organizationsCriticism of work in effective altruismEffective altruism fundingPodcasts

Metadata

Importance: 42/100forum postcommentary

Summary

Oliver Habryka argues that Open Philanthropy Project's funding decisions have become increasingly constrained by the reputational concerns of primary funder Dustin Moskovitz and Good Ventures since mid-2023. He claims poor communication between Open Phil staff and Good Ventures leadership has created a de facto requirement that grants be not just low-risk but obviously low-risk, limiting funding for important but controversial work. Open Phil provided a written response but declined to participate in the recorded discussion.

Key Points

  • Habryka claims Open Phil has shifted to requiring 'obviously low reputational risk' rather than merely 'low reputational risk' in grant decisions since mid-2023/early-2024.
  • The dynamic allegedly stems from poor communication channels between Open Phil program staff and Good Ventures/Moskovitz leadership.
  • This constraint may be limiting Open Phil's ability to fund important AI safety or other EA-adjacent work that carries reputational sensitivity.
  • The podcast is explicitly one-sided; Open Phil chose to submit a written response rather than participate in the recorded discussion.
  • The piece reflects broader tensions in the EA/AI safety funding ecosystem around institutional risk-aversion and donor influence over grantmaking.

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
Chan Zuckerberg InitiativeOrganization50.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 15, 20267 KB
Oliver Habryka on OpenPhil and GoodVentures — EA Forum 
 
 This website requires javascript to properly function. Consider activating javascript to get access to all site functionality. Oliver Habryka on OpenPhil and GoodVentures 

 by TimothyTelleenLawton May 2 2025 1 min read 1 34

 Community Building effective altruism Coefficient Giving Criticism of effective altruist organizations Criticism of work in effective altruism Effective altruism funding Podcasts Frontpage In this episode of our podcast, Elizabeth Van Nostrand and I talk to Oliver Habryka of Lightcone Infrastructure about his thoughts on the Open Philanthropy Project, which he believes has become stifled by the PR interests of its primary funder, Good Ventures.

 Oliver’s main claim is that around mid 2023 or early 2024, Good Ventures founder Dustin Moskovitz became more concerned about his reputation, and this put a straight jacket over what Open Phil could fund. Moreover it was not enough for a project to be good and pose low reputational risk; it had to be obviously low reputational risk, because OP employees didn’t have enough communication with Good Ventures to pitch exceptions.  According to Habryka.

 That’s a big caveat; this podcast is pretty one sided. We invited OpenPhil to send a representative to record their own episode, but they decided to just send a written response (which is linked below and read at end of the episode). If anyone out there wants to asynchronously argue with Habryka on a separate episode, we’d love to hear from you. 

 Transcript available here .

 Links from the episode:

 An Update From Good Ventures (note: Dustin has deleted his account and his comments are listed as anonymous, but are not the only anonymous)

 CEA announcing the sale of Wytham Abbey 

 OpenPhli career page 

 Job reporting to Amy WL 

 Zach’s “this is false” 

 Luke Muelhauser on GV not funding right of center work 

 Will MacAskill on decentralization and EA 

 Alexander Berger regrets the Wytham Abbey grant 

 Single Chan-Zuckerberg employee demanding resignation over failure to moderate Trump posts on Facebook

 Letter from 70+ CZ employees asking for more DEI within Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

 OpenPhil’s response 

 ( X-post LessWrong )

 34

 0 8 Reactions

 0 8 Comments 1 Comment Sorted by New & upvoted Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 12:35 AM Yarrow Bouchard 🔸 May 3 2025 -4 14 13 I know very little about the context of the disagreements between Oliver Habryka and Dustin Moskovitz. I've read one of their backs-and-forths in comments on the EA Forum and it was almost impossible to follow what they were talking about, partly due to both of their writing styles, but also probably due to there being a lot of context and background they weren't trying to explain to people like me who weren't already in the know. 

I think Dustin may also have purposely been trying to be a bit vague because he was sick of being criticized by people on the EA For

... (truncated, 7 KB total)
Resource ID: 9a0e1a4cfc6921e6 | Stable ID: NzBhNjAyMW