Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Center for Human-Compatible AI

web

Published by CHAI in October 2024, this post covers research relevant to inner alignment and scalable oversight, particularly how mentor signals might address goal misgeneralization — a key concern for deploying agents in novel environments.

Metadata

Importance: 52/100blog postanalysis

Summary

This CHAI blog post discusses research on goal misgeneralization — where AI agents pursue unintended goals outside their training distribution — and explores how mentor-guided feedback or oversight can help mitigate this inner alignment failure. The work examines whether providing agents with a 'mentor' signal during deployment can correct or detect misaligned behavior stemming from distribution shift.

Key Points

  • Goal misgeneralization occurs when an agent learns a proxy goal that works in training but diverges from intended behavior under distribution shift.
  • The research investigates using a mentor or oversight mechanism to help agents recover or correct misaligned goals at deployment time.
  • Addresses the inner alignment problem: even capable, well-trained agents may generalize the wrong objective to new environments.
  • Mentor-assisted correction offers a potential practical intervention to reduce risks from goal misgeneralization without full retraining.
  • Work connects to broader challenges of scalable oversight and ensuring AI systems remain aligned outside training distributions.

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
Goal MisgeneralizationRisk63.0

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 20, 20262 KB
![](https://humancompatible.ai/app/uploads/2023/10/chai-logo_a729cbef.png)

Khanh Nguyen, Mohamad Danesh, Ben Plaut, and Alina Trinh wrote [this paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.21052) which was presented at Towards Safe & Trustworthy Agents Workshop at NeurIPS 2024.

While reinforcement learning (RL) agents often perform well during training, they can struggle with distribution shift in real-world deployments. One particularly severe risk of distribution shift is goal misgeneralization, where the agent learns a proxy goal that coincides with the true goal during training but not during deployment. In this paper, we explore whether allowing an agent to ask for help from a supervisor in unfamiliar situations can mitigate this issue.

- [Mailing List](https://humancompatible.ai/#mailinglist)

- [Mission](https://humancompatible.ai/about#mission)
- [Partners](https://humancompatible.ai/about#partners)
- [Privacy Policy](https://humancompatible.ai/privacypolicy/)

- [Faculty](https://humancompatible.ai/people#faculty)
- [Staff](https://humancompatible.ai/people#staff)
- [Researchers](https://humancompatible.ai/people#researchers)
- [Research Fellows](https://humancompatible.ai/people/#research-fellows)
- [Visiting Scholars](https://humancompatible.ai/people#visiting-scholars)
- [Alumni](https://humancompatible.ai/people#alumni)
- [Affiliates](https://humancompatible.ai/people#affiliates)
- [Students](https://humancompatible.ai/people#graduate-students)
- [Affiliated Students](https://humancompatible.ai/people#affiliated-graduate-students)
- [Interns](https://humancompatible.ai/people#interns)
- [Former Interns](https://humancompatible.ai/people#former-interns)

Center for Human-Compatible AI
Resource ID: 9be55e9fae95aa1b | Stable ID: MTZhMTRkMW