Back
Commentary Magazine - The MacArthur Mistake
webcommentary.org·commentary.org/articles/wooster-martin-morse/the-macarthu...
A skeptical mainstream conservative publication critique of AI safety philanthropy and longtermism; useful for understanding outside perspectives and criticism of the AI safety funding ecosystem, though not directly a technical or policy contribution to AI safety research.
Metadata
Importance: 28/100opinion piececommentary
Summary
This Commentary Magazine article critically examines the MacArthur Foundation's funding priorities in AI safety and related cause areas, arguing that philanthropic resources are being misallocated toward speculative long-term risks at the expense of more pressing concerns. The piece questions the assumptions underlying longtermist AI safety philanthropy and its influence on policy and research directions.
Key Points
- •Critiques major philanthropic foundations for prioritizing speculative AI existential risks over near-term, more tractable problems
- •Questions the intellectual foundations of longtermism as a guiding framework for large-scale charitable giving
- •Argues that AI safety philanthropy may be distorting research agendas and public policy discussions
- •Examines the influence of effective altruism-aligned funders on shaping narratives around AI governance
- •Raises concerns about accountability and oversight of philanthropic decisions affecting AI development trajectories
Cited by 1 page
| Page | Type | Quality |
|---|---|---|
| MacArthur Foundation | Organization | 65.0 |
Cached Content Preview
HTTP 200Fetched Mar 20, 202632 KB
Close
#### Login
Access your _Commentary_ account.
Email address
Password
Remember me
Login
Forgot your password?
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
Email
Reset password
Go back
- [Home](https://www.commentary.org/)
- [April 2026](https://www.commentary.org/issues/april-2026/)
- [Donate](https://donate.stripe.com/aEU5kp4RF8kO5gc6ou)
- [Newsletter](https://www.commentary.org/newsletter/)
- [Merch](https://shop.commentary.org/)
- [Contact Us](https://www.commentary.org/contact/)
- [Subscribe](https://www.commentary.org/subscribe/)
[Search](https://www.commentary.org/articles/wooster-martin-morse/the-macarthur-mistake/#)
[Login](https://www.commentary.org/articles/wooster-martin-morse/the-macarthur-mistake/#)
> _There was no management association looking at Michelangelo and asking him to fill out semi-yearly progress reports in triplicate. Our aim is to support individual genius and free those people from the bureaucratic pettiness of academe._
>
> —J. Roderick MacArthur, 1979
>
> The MacArthur Fellows Program, commonly known as the “genius awards,” has many virtues. It is decentralized. It revived the notion of philanthropies giving directly to individuals, and it has spawned scores of imitators from foundations large and small that offer scores of prizes for the great and the good.
>
> Moreover, the MacArthur Fellowship is the one philanthropic grant everyone wants and everyone dreams about. Because you cannot apply for it, the traditional nonprofit dance between the grant-seeking supplicant and the grant-wielding mandarin is eliminated.
>
> And because you cannot apply for a MacArthur Fellowship, it has acquired what the program’s current director, Daniel J. Socolow, calls “that veil of mystery” that “is part of the magic” of the fellowships. They are awards every creative person wants, and they are ones wherein directors of the program find they suddenly have scores of new friends.
>
> Catharine Stimpson, who directed the MacArthur Fellows Program between 1993 and 1996, told the _New York Times_ in 2002 that when she was program director, “a lot of people advertised themselves. They’d say, ‘You don’t know this but I’m a genius.’ I got the sweetest call from a young man who said, ‘I love my wife. She’s a talented artist. Won’t you give her a MacArthur?’” The MacArthur Fellowships have become one of the few philanthropic awards to become part of popular culture. Despite its luster, the MacArthur Fellowship is a philanthropic mistake—a project that fails on its own terms. Through the wise guidance of mandarins looking for undiscovered genius, the MacArthur Foundation argues, great deeds will occur. This has not happened.
>
> \\_\\_\\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
>
> John D. MacArthur (1897–1978), the founder of Bankers Life and Casualty, left most of his billion-dollar fortune to charity with no instructions on how it was to be used. “I figured out how to make the
... (truncated, 32 KB total)Resource ID:
b6d5293f306be7f5 | Stable ID: YTY4OGRjZj