Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Internet Policy Review

web

Published in Internet Policy Review, this piece is relevant to AI safety discussions around manipulation, deceptive alignment, and the ethics of persuasive AI systems; useful for policy and governance research on autonomous systems and human autonomy.

Metadata

Importance: 45/100journal articleanalysis

Summary

This article from Internet Policy Review examines the intersection of technology design, user autonomy, and digital manipulation, analyzing how algorithmic systems and persuasive technologies can undermine informed decision-making. It likely proposes frameworks for distinguishing legitimate persuasion from manipulation in digital contexts, with implications for AI system design and governance.

Key Points

  • Explores the tension between technology-driven persuasion and preservation of individual user autonomy in digital environments.
  • Distinguishes between legitimate influence and manipulative design patterns in algorithmic and AI-driven systems.
  • Analyzes policy implications for regulating persuasive technologies and protecting users from covert manipulation.
  • Relevant to AI alignment concerns around value manipulation and the ethics of AI systems that influence human behavior.
  • Contributes to governance frameworks addressing transparency and accountability in automated decision-making systems.

Cited by 1 page

PageTypeQuality
AI Preference ManipulationRisk55.0
Resource ID: f020a9bd097dca11 | Stable ID: NTBjMzZlYT