Skip to content
Longterm Wiki

SaferAI Ratings

by SaferAI·Latest: October 2025·Source ↗

Continuously-updated risk-management ratings for frontier developers across four pillars: risk identification, analysis & evaluation, treatment, and governance.

Organizations
12
Dimensions
5
Snapshots
1
Latest wave
October 2025

Grades by dimension — October 2025

Rows are organizations; columns are the dimensions SaferAI scores. Cell text is the published grade (overall first, then per-pillar).

OrganizationOverallRisk Analysis and EvaluationRisk GovernanceRisk IdentificationRisk Treatment
AmazonVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery Weak
AnthropicWeakVery WeakWeakWeakWeak
CohereVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery Weak
G42Very WeakVery WeakWeakVery WeakVery Weak
Google DeepMindVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakWeak
MagicVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery Weak
Meta AI (FAIR)Very WeakWeakVery WeakVery WeakVery Weak
Microsoft AIVery WeakVery WeakWeakVery WeakWeak
NaverVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery Weak
NVIDIAVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery Weak
OpenAIWeakWeakWeakWeakWeak
xAIVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery WeakVery Weak

Snapshot history

WavePublishedOrgsLicenseLinks
October 2025latest2025-10-0112CC BY-SA 4.0

Methodology

Continuously-updated risk-management ratings for frontier developers across four pillars: risk identification, analysis & evaluation, treatment, and governance.

Source ↗Methodology ↗License: CC BY-SA 4.0Status: active

Grades are mirrored from upstream sources. We do not score organizations ourselves — see the source link for full methodology and per-indicator detail. Citation of published grades is consistent with fair-use attribution.