Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
All Source Checks
Citation

EA Global - Footnote 54

unverifiable10% confidence

1 evidence check

Last checked: 4/3/2026

The source does not contain the 2024 EA community survey results, the percentages for global health interest and selection as most pressing, or the AI safety dominance percentage. It also does not mention elite discussions at conferences like EA Global disproportionately favoring speculative cause areas over empirically validated interventions.

Evidence — 1 source, 1 check

unverifiable10%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
Found: The 2024 EA community survey showed global health receiving interest from 36% of respondents but only 8% selecting it as most pressing, while AI safety dominated at 53%. Critics note that global pover

Note: The source does not contain the 2024 EA community survey results, the percentages for global health interest and selection as most pressing, or the AI safety dominance percentage. It also does not mention elite discussions at conferences like EA Global disproportionately favoring speculative cause areas over empirically validated interventions.

Debug info

Record type: citation

Record ID: page:ea-global:fn54