Citation

EA Institutions' Response to the FTX Collapse - Footnote 33

contradicted50% confidence

1 evidence check

Last checked: 4/3/2026

WRONG DATE: The article states that some EA leaders claimed the movement was 'back and more relevant than ever' by 2024, citing new donations. However, the article was published in 2025 and references a 2024 uptick in giving. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions a Rethink Priorities student survey finding limited FTX salience among non-EA-affiliated university students (5.6% mentioned it unprompted). This information is not found in the provided source text.

Evidence — 1 source, 1 check

www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/effective-altruism-sam-bankman-fried-comeback-1236327219/(1 check)

contradicted50%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

Found: - **Reputational recovery**: Whether the EA brand has recovered among key audiences—academics, potential donors, students, policymakers—is difficult to assess comprehensively. The Rethink Priorities s…

Note: WRONG DATE: The article states that some EA leaders claimed the movement was 'back and more relevant than ever' by 2024, citing new donations. However, the article was published in 2025 and references a 2024 uptick in giving. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions a Rethink Priorities student survey finding limited FTX salience among non-EA-affiliated university students (5.6% mentioned it unprompted). This information is not found in the provided source text.

Debug info

Record type: citation

Record ID: page:ea-institutions-response-to-the-ftx-collapse:fn33