EA and Longtermist Wins and Losses - Footnote 28
1 evidence check
Last checked: 4/3/2026
unsupported: The claim that the Against Malaria Foundation has protected over 667 million people is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that CEA reports strong engagement growth in 2025 after post-FTX declines is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that hundreds of millions of dollars have flowed to existential risk research is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that AI safety work has gained mainstream policy traction is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that California has signed bills directly regulating AI risk is not supported by the source.
Evidence — 1 source, 1 check
Note: unsupported: The claim that the Against Malaria Foundation has protected over 667 million people is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that CEA reports strong engagement growth in 2025 after post-FTX declines is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that hundreds of millions of dollars have flowed to existential risk research is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that AI safety work has gained mainstream policy traction is not supported by the source. unsupported: The claim that California has signed bills directly regulating AI risk is not supported by the source.
Debug info
Record type: citation
Record ID: page:ea-longtermist-wins-losses:fn28