EA and Longtermist Wins and Losses - Footnote 4
1 evidence check
Last checked: 4/3/2026
WRONG NUMBERS: GiveWell amounts are not mentioned in the source. WRONG NUMBERS: Against Malaria Foundation numbers are not mentioned in the source. OVERCLAIMS: The source only discusses CEA's growth, not the entire EA movement. MISLEADING PARAPHRASE: The claim implies that AI safety work gaining mainstream policy traction and California signing bills directly regulating AI risk are achievements of the EA movement, but the source does not mention these. FABRICATED DETAILS: The source does not mention hundreds of millions of dollars flowing to existential risk research.
Evidence — 1 source, 1 check
Note: WRONG NUMBERS: GiveWell amounts are not mentioned in the source. WRONG NUMBERS: Against Malaria Foundation numbers are not mentioned in the source. OVERCLAIMS: The source only discusses CEA's growth, not the entire EA movement. MISLEADING PARAPHRASE: The claim implies that AI safety work gaining mainstream policy traction and California signing bills directly regulating AI risk are achievements of the EA movement, but the source does not mention these. FABRICATED DETAILS: The source does not mention hundreds of millions of dollars flowing to existential risk research.
Debug info
Record type: citation
Record ID: page:ea-longtermist-wins-losses:fn4