Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
All Source Checks
Citation

Good Judgment (Forecasting) - Footnote 44

partial80% confidence

1 evidence check

Last checked: 4/3/2026

The source does not mention that Good Judgment outperformed *Financial Times* readers on forecasts for 2023 events. The source does not mention that Good Judgment proved 30% more accurate than futures markets on central bank interest rate decisions during 2024-2025. The source states that the Superforecasters received full marks on forecasts published last year in “The World Ahead 2023” issue, and that eight of the nine questions have resolved. The wiki claim states that Good Judgment superforecasters earned full marks on 8 out of 9 resolved forecasts.

Evidence — 1 source, 1 check

partial80%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
Found: In 2023, Good Judgment superforecasters earned full marks on 8 out of 9 resolved forecasts in *The Economist*, correctly predicting global economic growth at 3%, China's growth at 5%, and that Putin w

Note: The source does not mention that Good Judgment outperformed *Financial Times* readers on forecasts for 2023 events. The source does not mention that Good Judgment proved 30% more accurate than futures markets on central bank interest rate decisions during 2024-2025. The source states that the Superforecasters received full marks on forecasts published last year in “The World Ahead 2023” issue, and that eight of the nine questions have resolved. The wiki claim states that Good Judgment superforecasters earned full marks on 8 out of 9 resolved forecasts.

Debug info

Record type: citation

Record ID: page:good-judgment:fn44