Good Judgment (Forecasting) - Footnote 45
1 evidence check
Last checked: 4/3/2026
unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters earned full marks on 8 out of 9 resolved forecasts in The Economist. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters correctly predicting global economic growth at 3%, China's growth at 5%, and that Putin would not be ousted from power. misleading paraphrase: The source states that Superforecasters outperformed Financial Times readers on forecasts for 2023 events, but it does not specify that there were 8,500 participants from Financial Times. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters proved 30% more accurate than futures markets on central bank interest rate decisions during 2024-2025.
Evidence — 1 source, 1 check
Note: unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters earned full marks on 8 out of 9 resolved forecasts in The Economist. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters correctly predicting global economic growth at 3%, China's growth at 5%, and that Putin would not be ousted from power. misleading paraphrase: The source states that Superforecasters outperformed Financial Times readers on forecasts for 2023 events, but it does not specify that there were 8,500 participants from Financial Times. unsupported: The source does not mention that Good Judgment superforecasters proved 30% more accurate than futures markets on central bank interest rate decisions during 2024-2025.
Debug info
Record type: citation
Record ID: page:good-judgment:fn45