Good Judgment (Forecasting) - Footnote 75
1 evidence check
Last checked: 4/3/2026
The claim states that superforecasters outperformed prediction markets by 15-30%, but the source says teams of superforecasters outperformed prediction markets by 15-30%. The claim states that superforecasters outperformed intelligence analysts by 25-30%, but the source says that the Good Judgment Project outperformed a prediction market inside the intelligence community by 25-30%.
Evidence — 1 source, 1 check
Note: The claim states that superforecasters outperformed prediction markets by 15-30%, but the source says teams of superforecasters outperformed prediction markets by 15-30%. The claim states that superforecasters outperformed intelligence analysts by 25-30%, but the source says that the Good Judgment Project outperformed a prediction market inside the intelligence community by 25-30%.
Debug info
Record type: citation
Record ID: page:good-judgment:fn75