Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
All Source Checks
Citation

Gwern Branwen - Footnote 45

partial85% confidence

1 evidence check

Last checked: 4/3/2026

The claim mentions 'Gwern's own framework on critiquing research highlights flaws like conflicts of interest, lack of power analysis, genetic confounding, and overreliance on interaction terms'. The source does not explicitly list these as Gwern's framework or standards. The claim states 'critics note intersects with weaker average arguments for mainstream ideas and perceptual biases'. The source mentions 'Yvain’s thing about mainstream ideas have worse average arguments', but does not explicitly mention perceptual biases in the same context.

Evidence — 1 source, 1 check

partial85%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
Found: Gwern's own framework on critiquing research highlights flaws like conflicts of interest, lack of power analysis, genetic confounding, and overreliance on interaction terms—standards by which some stu

Note: The claim mentions 'Gwern's own framework on critiquing research highlights flaws like conflicts of interest, lack of power analysis, genetic confounding, and overreliance on interaction terms'. The source does not explicitly list these as Gwern's framework or standards. The claim states 'critics note intersects with weaker average arguments for mainstream ideas and perceptual biases'. The source mentions 'Yvain’s thing about mainstream ideas have worse average arguments', but does not explicitly mention perceptual biases in the same context.

Debug info

Record type: citation

Record ID: page:gwern:fn45

Source Check: Gwern Branwen - Footnote 45 | Longterm Wiki