Longtermism's Philosophical Credibility After FTX - Footnote 47

Note: The claim that global health and development organizations funded by EA were uncertain whether their funding pipelines would survive the collapse is not explicitly stated in the article. The claim that roughly 70% of Open Philanthropy's total funding had gone toward global health and wellbeing, with approximately 30% toward longtermist areas is not mentioned in the article. The claim that the subsequent rebranding to 'Global Catastrophic Risks' further blurred the near-term/long-term distinction at the organizational level is not mentioned in the article.