Philip Tetlock - Footnote 97
1 evidence check
Last checked: 4/3/2026
The claim that superforecasters were '30% more accurate on average than futures markets' is not directly supported by the source. The source only states that superforecasters 'continued to beat the market so far this year when it comes to anticipating Fed decisions'. The claim mentions 'the continued relevance of Tetlock's forecasting methods', but the source does not explicitly mention this.
Evidence — 1 source, 1 check
Note: The claim that superforecasters were '30% more accurate on average than futures markets' is not directly supported by the source. The source only states that superforecasters 'continued to beat the market so far this year when it comes to anticipating Fed decisions'. The claim mentions 'the continued relevance of Tetlock's forecasting methods', but the source does not explicitly mention this.
Debug info
Record type: citation
Record ID: page:philip-tetlock:fn97