All Source Checks
Citation
Rethink Priorities - Footnote 41
confirmed100% confidence
1 evidence check
Last checked: 4/3/2026
Migrated from citation_quotes. Original verdict: accurate
Evidence — 1 source, 1 check
forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/E9NnR9cJMM7m5G2r4/is-rp-s-moral-weights-project-too-animal-friendly-fourEA Funds(1 check)
confirmed100%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
Found: Critics argue that if you reject the assumptions of the project, then you shouldn’t use their numbers as moral weights.
Note: Migrated from citation_quotes accuracy check. Original verdict: accurate
Debug info
Record type: citation
Record ID: page:rethink-priorities:fn41