Index
Citation·page:ea-longtermist-wins-losses:fn4
EA and Longtermist Wins and Losses - Footnote 4
Verdictcontradicted30%
1 check · 4/29/20261 → contradicted
Our claim
entire recordNo record data available.
Source evidence
1 src · 1 checkforum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NKrpEdg7wAgcoHNRG/cea-is-growing-again-25-more-people-engaged-with-our-1resource
contradicted30%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
NoteWRONG NUMBERS: GiveWell amounts are not mentioned in the source. WRONG NUMBERS: Against Malaria Foundation numbers are not mentioned in the source. OVERCLAIMS: The source only discusses CEA's growth, not the entire EA movement. MISLEADING PARAPHRASE: The claim implies that AI safety work gaining mainstream policy traction and California signing bills directly regulating AI risk are achievements of the EA movement, but the source does not mention these. FABRICATED DETAILS: The source does not mention hundreds of millions of dollars flowing to existential risk research.
Case № page:ea-longtermist-wins-losses:fn4Filed 4/29/2026Confidence 30%