Citation·page:good-judgment:fn79

Good Judgment (Forecasting) - Footnote 79

Verdictconfirmed90%

2 checks · 1 src · 4/29/2026

1 → partial; dissent: 1 → confirmed

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 2 checks

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7333631/resource

partial95%qua650-retro-scan-subject-identity · 4/21/2026

NoteQUA-650 retro-scan: The claim subject is 'citation/page:good-judgment:fn79', which refers to a specific footnote in what appears to be a work called 'good-judgment'. The source is a 2020 academic paper about superforecasting that discusses Tetlock and Mellers' research, but it is not itself the 'good-judgment' work or that specific footnote. This is a secondary source discussing superforecasting research, not the primary source being cited.

confirmed90%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

NoteMigrated from citation_quotes accuracy check. Original verdict: accurate

Case № page:good-judgment:fn79Filed 4/29/2026Confidence 95%