Index
Citation·page:longtermism-credibility-after-ftx:fn52
Longtermism's Philosophical Credibility After FTX - Footnote 52
Verdictconfirmed100%
2 checks · 1 src · 4/29/20261 → partial; dissent: 1 → confirmed
Our claim
entire recordNo record data available.
Source evidence
1 src · 2 checkspartial95%qua650-retro-scan-subject-identity · 4/21/2026
NoteQUA-650 retro-scan: The claim's subject is a specific footnote (fn52) from a page about longtermism and FTX credibility, while the source is a general PhilPapers bibliography page about longtermism as a philosophical topic. These are different entities - one is a specific citation/footnote within an article, the other is a general topic bibliography. The source cannot verify a specific footnote without showing the actual footnote content.
confirmed100%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
NoteMigrated from citation_quotes accuracy check. Original verdict: accurate
Case № page:longtermism-credibility-after-ftx:fn52Filed 4/29/2026Confidence 95%