Index
Citation·page:max-tegmark:fn34
Max Tegmark - Footnote 34
Verdictconfirmed90%
2 checks · 1 src · 4/29/20261 → partial; dissent: 1 → confirmed
Our claim
entire recordNo record data available.
Source evidence
1 src · 2 checksforum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/HN4ECPh5bPykBgvT8/did-bengio-and-tegmark-lose-a-debate-about-ai-x-risk-againstresource
partial95%qua650-retro-scan-subject-identity · 4/21/2026
NoteQUA-650 retro-scan: The claim's subject is a specific footnote (fn34) from Max Tegmark's work, while the source is about a debate event where Tegmark participated. A debate appearance is not the same entity as a specific citation/footnote in a document. Per QUA-648, this is a mismatch between a product/content (the footnote) and a related but different entity (the debate).
confirmed90%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
NoteMigrated from citation_quotes accuracy check. Original verdict: accurate
Case № page:max-tegmark:fn34Filed 4/29/2026Confidence 95%