Citation·page:openclaw-matplotlib-incident-2026:fn56

OpenClaw Matplotlib Incident (2026) - Footnote 56

Verdictconfirmed100%

2 checks · 1 src · 4/29/2026

1 → partial; dissent: 1 → confirmed

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 2 checks

theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-wrote-a-hit-piece-on-me-part-4/resource

partial95%qua650-retro-scan-subject-identity · 4/21/2026

NoteQUA-650 retro-scan: The claim subject is a citation/page reference (openclaw-matplotlib-incident-2026:fn56), which appears to be a footnote or citation within a document about the OpenClaw-matplotlib incident. The source is a blog post about the incident itself, not a citation or footnote within another work. The source is the primary incident narrative, not a citation reference to it—these are different entities per QUA-648 guidelines.

confirmed100%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

NoteMigrated from citation_quotes accuracy check. Original verdict: accurate

Case № page:openclaw-matplotlib-incident-2026:fn56Filed 4/29/2026Confidence 95%