Index
Citation·page:rethink-priorities:fn25
Rethink Priorities - Footnote 25
Verdictconfirmed100%
2 checks · 1 src · 4/29/20261 → partial; dissent: 1 → confirmed
Our claim
entire recordNo record data available.
Source evidence
1 src · 2 checksforum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/E9NnR9cJMM7m5G2r4/is-rp-s-moral-weights-project-too-animal-friendly-fourresource
partial95%qua650-retro-scan-subject-identity · 4/21/2026
NoteQUA-650 retro-scan: The claim's subject is a specific citation/footnote (fn25) from a Rethink Priorities page, while the source is a critical analysis essay about Rethink Priorities' Moral Weights Project itself. The source discusses the project as a whole entity rather than serving as the specific citation being verified. Per QUA-648, a project/product is a mismatch from a specific citation within an organization's work.
confirmed100%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026
NoteMigrated from citation_quotes accuracy check. Original verdict: accurate
Case № page:rethink-priorities:fn25Filed 4/29/2026Confidence 95%