Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Citation·page:samotsvety:fn16

Samotsvety - Footnote 16

Verdictcontradicted50%
2 checks · 1 src · 4/29/2026

1 → contradicted; dissent: 1 → partial

Our claim

entire record

No record data available.

Source evidence

1 src · 2 checks
partial70%citation-accuracy-check · 4/20/2026

NoteThe percentages for transformative AI in 2030, 2050, and 2100 are different in the source. The source only provides a percentage for 2100 (81%), while the claim provides percentages for 2030 (28%), 2050 (60%), and 2100 (89%). The source states 25% chance of misaligned AI takeover by 2100, while the claim states 25% by 2100. The source includes the caveat "barring pre- APS-AI catastrophe" which is not included in the claim.

contradicted50%Haiku 4.5 · 4/3/2026

NoteWRONG NUMBERS: The claim includes timelines for transformative AI (28% by 2030, 60% by 2050, 89% by 2100), but the source only mentions 81% chance of Transformative AI (TAI) by 2100. WRONG NUMBERS: The claim states 89% by 2100, but the source states 81% by 2100. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions that the group released influential AI risk forecasts throughout 2023-2024, but the source is dated September 9, 2022, and does not mention any activities in 2023-2024. UNSUPPORTED: The claim mentions that their work has been incorporated into literature reviews by Epoch AI and cited in discussions about AI safety policy, but the source does not mention this.

Case № page:samotsvety:fn16Filed 4/29/2026Confidence 50%
Source Check: Samotsvety - Footnote 16 | Longterm Wiki