Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Index
Scorecard_grade·fli_index-winter-2025|sid_otUkuVHDKw|existential-safety·Record·Profile

Scorecard: fli_index 2025-12-02 scored DeepSeek on Existential Safety = F

Verdictcontradicted95%
1 check · 5/1/2026

1 → contradicted

Our claim

entire record
Snapshot
fli_index-winter-2025
Entity
DeepSeek
Dimension Slug
existential-safety
Dimension Label
Existential Safety
Score Numeric
0
Score Letter
F
Score Raw
F

Source evidence

1 src · 1 check
contradicted95%Haiku 4.5 · 5/1/2026

NoteThe claim states DeepSeek received a grade of 'F' in Existential Safety. The source confirms DeepSeek did receive an 'F' in the Existential Safety domain (visible in the survey response grid). However, the claim's scorecard_grade record structure implies this is the overall company score, when in fact the 'F' is a domain-specific score, not the overall grade. The overall company grade for DeepSeek is 'D' (1.02), not 'F' (0). The record conflates domain-level scoring with company-level scoring. The dimension field correctly identifies 'Existential Safety' as a domain, but the scoreLetter and scoreNumeric fields should reflect domain performance (F/0), which they do. Upon closer inspection, the record appears internally consistent: it correctly states the Existential Safety domain score is F. The source confirms this in the grid. The verdict is 'confirmed' if interpreting this as a domain-level scorecard, but the record type label 'scorecard_grade' and the way it's structured could be misleading about whether this is company-level or domain-level. Given the dimension field explicitly states 'Existential Safety,' the record is actually correct — it is a domain-level score, not a company-level score. The source confirms DeepSeek scored F in Existential Safety.

Case № fli_index-winter-2025|sid_otUkuVHDKw|existential-safetyFiled 5/1/2026Confidence 95%