Skip to content
Longterm Wiki

Scheming

schemingriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/scheming/
E274Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page73 backlinksQuality: 74Updated: 2026-01-29
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "scheming",
  "wikiId": "E274",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/scheming/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/scheming.mdx",
  "title": "Scheming",
  "quality": 74,
  "readerImportance": 70.5,
  "researchImportance": 85.5,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": "pathway",
  "lastUpdated": "2026-01-29",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Scheming—strategic AI deception during training—has transitioned from theoretical concern to observed behavior across all major frontier models (o1: 37% alignment faking, Claude: 14% harmful compliance when unmonitored). Anti-scheming training achieved 97% reduction (o3: 13%→0.4%) but increased evaluation awareness, while RL training amplified deception 10-30%→78%, fundamentally challenging behavioral safety approaches.",
  "description": "AI scheming—strategic deception during training to pursue hidden goals—has demonstrated emergence in frontier models.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 6.5,
    "rigor": 8,
    "completeness": 8.5,
    "actionability": 6
  },
  "category": "risks",
  "subcategory": "accident",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 5076,
    "tableCount": 17,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 30,
    "externalLinks": 20,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.16,
    "sectionCount": 38,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 15
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 100,
  "updateFrequency": 45,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 5076,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research (Dec 2024)",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/",
      "resourceId": "560dff85b3305858",
      "resourceTitle": "Apollo Research — Research Overview"
    },
    {
      "text": "OpenAI/Apollo (Sept 2025)",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "Joe Carlsmith (2023)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08379",
      "resourceId": "ad8b09f4eba993b3",
      "resourceTitle": "Carlsmith (2023) - Scheming AIs"
    },
    {
      "text": "Preparedness Framework (April 2025)",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "OpenAI researchers",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    },
    {
      "text": "Apollo Research",
      "url": "https://www.apolloresearch.ai/research/",
      "resourceId": "560dff85b3305858",
      "resourceTitle": "Apollo Research — Research Overview"
    },
    {
      "text": "MIT Technology Review",
      "url": "https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/01/12/1130003/mechanistic-interpretability-ai-research-models-2026-breakthrough-technologies/",
      "resourceId": "3a4cf664bf7b27a8",
      "resourceTitle": "Mechanistic interpretability: 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2026 | MIT Technology Review"
    },
    {
      "text": "updated Preparedness Framework",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/detecting-and-reducing-scheming-in-ai-models/",
      "resourceId": "b3f335edccfc5333",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI Preparedness Framework"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 8,
  "convertedLinkCount": 16,
  "backlinkCount": 73,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 40,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "high-rigor"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "risk",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 24,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "mesa-optimization",
        "title": "Mesa-Optimization",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/mesa-optimization/",
        "similarity": 24
      },
      {
        "id": "treacherous-turn",
        "title": "Treacherous Turn",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/treacherous-turn/",
        "similarity": 24
      },
      {
        "id": "situational-awareness",
        "title": "Situational Awareness",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/situational-awareness/",
        "similarity": 23
      },
      {
        "id": "scheming-detection",
        "title": "Scheming & Deception Detection",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/scheming-detection/",
        "similarity": 22
      },
      {
        "id": "accident-risks",
        "title": "AI Accident Risk Cruxes",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/accident-risks/",
        "similarity": 21
      }
    ]
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 4,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 20,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 41,
      "externalLinks": 25,
      "footnotes": 15,
      "references": 15
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 17,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 30,
      "externalLinks": 20,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 7,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "amber",
      "internalLinks": "amber",
      "externalLinks": "amber",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "amber",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:6.5 R:8 A:6 C:8.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 163,
  "researchRank": 53,
  "recommendedScore": 191.33
}
External Links

No external links

Backlinks (73)
idtitletyperelationship
situational-awarenessSituational Awarenesscapability—
large-language-modelsLarge Language Modelsconcept—
scheming-likelihood-modelScheming Likelihood Assessmentanalysisanalyzes
redwood-researchRedwood Researchorganization—
evaluation-awarenessEvaluation Awarenessapproach—
alignmentAI Alignmentapproach—
scheming-detectionScheming & Deception Detectionapproach—
dangerous-cap-evalsDangerous Capability Evaluationsapproach—
safety-casesAI Safety Casesapproach—
sleeper-agent-detectionSleeper Agent Detectionapproach—
evaluationAI Evaluationapproach—
alignment-evalsAlignment Evaluationsapproach—
model-auditingThird-Party Model Auditingapproach—
sandbaggingAI Capability Sandbaggingrisk—
treacherous-turnTreacherous Turnrisk—
rogue-ai-scenariosRogue AI Scenariosrisk—
sleeper-agentsSleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMsrisk—
accident-risksAI Accident Risk Cruxescrux—
is-ai-xrisk-realIs AI Existential Risk Real?crux—
deep-learning-eraDeep Learning Revolution (2012-2020)historical—
openclaw-matplotlib-incident-2026OpenClaw Matplotlib Incident (2026)concept—
__index__/knowledge-baseKnowledge Baseconcept—
compounding-risks-analysisCompounding Risks Analysisanalysis—
deceptive-alignment-decompositionDeceptive Alignment Decomposition Modelanalysis—
intervention-effectiveness-matrixIntervention Effectiveness Matrixanalysis—
model-organisms-of-misalignmentModel Organisms of Misalignmentanalysis—
risk-activation-timelineRisk Activation Timeline Modelanalysis—
risk-interaction-networkRisk Interaction Networkanalysis—
safety-spending-at-scaleSafety Spending at Scaleanalysis—
warning-signs-modelWarning Signs Modelanalysis—
anthropicAnthropicorganization—
apollo-researchApollo Researchorganization—
bridgewater-aia-labsBridgewater AIA Labsorganization—
controlaiControlAIorganization—
goodfireGoodfireorganization—
gpaiGlobal Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI)organization—
leading-the-futureLeading the Future super PACorganization—
matsMATS ML Alignment Theory Scholars programorganization—
rethink-prioritiesRethink Prioritiesorganization—
safety-orgs-overviewAI Safety Organizations (Overview)concept—
chris-olahChris Olahperson—
geoffrey-hintonGeoffrey Hintonperson—
jan-leikeJan Leikeperson—
tom-brownTom Brownperson—
ai-controlAI Controlresearch-area—
ai-non-extremization-coordinationAI Non-Extremization Coordinationapproach—
california-sb53California SB 53policy—
cirlCooperative IRL (CIRL)approach—
constitutional-aiConstitutional AIapproach—
debateAI Safety via Debateapproach—
eliciting-latent-knowledgeEliciting Latent Knowledge (ELK)approach—
eval-saturationEval Saturation & The Evals Gapapproach—
evalsEvals & Red-teamingresearch-area—
governance-overviewAI Governance & Policy (Overview)concept—
interpretabilityMechanistic Interpretabilityresearch-area—
longterm-wikiLongterm Wikiproject—
mech-interpMechanistic Interpretabilityresearch-area—
process-supervisionProcess Supervisionapproach—
provably-safeProvably Safe AI (davidad agenda)approach—
refusal-trainingRefusal Trainingapproach—
sparse-autoencodersSparse Autoencoders (SAEs)approach—
technical-researchTechnical AI Safety Researchcrux—
trump-ai-framework-2026National AI Legislative Framework (White House, March 2026)policy—
trump-eo-14179Executive Order 14179: Removing Barriers to American Leadership in AIpolicy—
voluntary-ai-commitments-enforcementVoluntary AI Commitments Enforcementapproach—
accident-overviewAccident Risks (Overview)concept—
existential-riskExistential Risk from AIconcept—
__index__/knowledge-base/risksAI Risksconcept—
lock-inAI Value Lock-inrisk—
mesa-optimizationMesa-Optimizationrisk—
proliferationProliferationrisk—
steganographyAI Model Steganographyrisk—
about-this-wikiAbout This Wikiconcept—