Skip to content
Longterm Wiki

Sycophancy

sycophancyriskPath: /knowledge-base/risks/sycophancy/
E295Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page31 backlinksQuality: 65Updated: 2026-01-28
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "sycophancy",
  "wikiId": "E295",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/risks/sycophancy/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/risks/sycophancy.mdx",
  "title": "Sycophancy",
  "quality": 65,
  "readerImportance": 15,
  "researchImportance": 19,
  "tacticalValue": null,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": "amplifier",
  "lastUpdated": "2026-01-28",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Sycophancy—AI systems agreeing with users over providing accurate information—affects 34-78% of interactions and represents an observable precursor to deceptive alignment. The page frames this as a concrete example of proxy goal pursuit (approval vs. benefit) with scaling concerns from current false agreement to potential superintelligent manipulation.",
  "description": "AI systems trained to seek user approval may systematically agree with users rather than providing accurate information—an observable failure mode that could generalize to more dangerous forms of deceptive alignment as systems become more capable.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 4,
    "rigor": 6,
    "completeness": 5,
    "actionability": 4
  },
  "category": "risks",
  "subcategory": "accident",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 766,
    "tableCount": 5,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 11,
    "externalLinks": 9,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0,
    "sectionCount": 9,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 13
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 87,
  "updateFrequency": 45,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 766,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "stronger sycophancy",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13548",
      "resourceId": "7951bdb54fd936a6",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic: \"Discovering Sycophancy in Language Models\""
    },
    {
      "text": "Sharma et al. (2023)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13548",
      "resourceId": "7951bdb54fd936a6",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic: \"Discovering Sycophancy in Language Models\""
    },
    {
      "text": "Larger models show stronger sycophancy",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13548",
      "resourceId": "7951bdb54fd936a6",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic: \"Discovering Sycophancy in Language Models\""
    },
    {
      "text": "GPT-4o incident",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/sycophancy-in-gpt-4o/",
      "resourceId": "f435f5756eed9e6e",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI rolled back a GPT-4o update"
    },
    {
      "text": "Linear interventions can reduce sycophantic outputs",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13548",
      "resourceId": "7951bdb54fd936a6",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic: \"Discovering Sycophancy in Language Models\""
    },
    {
      "text": "Anthropic (2025)",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/research/towards-understanding-sycophancy-in-language-models",
      "resourceId": "6aca063a1249c289",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic's research on sycophancy"
    },
    {
      "text": "Perez et al. 2022",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09251",
      "resourceId": "cd36bb65654c0147",
      "resourceTitle": "Perez et al. (2022): \"Sycophancy in LLMs\""
    },
    {
      "text": "OpenAI rolled back a GPT-4o update",
      "url": "https://openai.com/index/sycophancy-in-gpt-4o/",
      "resourceId": "f435f5756eed9e6e",
      "resourceTitle": "OpenAI rolled back a GPT-4o update"
    },
    {
      "text": "collaborative safety testing",
      "url": "https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/openai-findings/",
      "resourceId": "2fdf91febf06daaf",
      "resourceTitle": "Anthropic-OpenAI joint evaluation"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 9,
  "convertedLinkCount": 4,
  "backlinkCount": 31,
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "medium",
    "score": 55,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "risk",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 0,
    "similarPages": []
  },
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 9,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 3,
      "diagrams": 0,
      "internalLinks": 6,
      "externalLinks": 4,
      "footnotes": 2,
      "references": 2
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 5,
      "diagrams": 1,
      "internalLinks": 11,
      "externalLinks": 9,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 15,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 0,
      "quotesTotal": 0,
      "accuracyChecked": 0,
      "accuracyTotal": 0
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "red",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "green",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "green",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "red",
      "accuracy": "red"
    },
    "ratingsString": "N:4 R:6 A:4 C:5"
  },
  "readerRank": 554,
  "researchRank": 494,
  "recommendedScore": 144.91
}
External Links
{
  "lesswrong": "https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/sycophancy"
}
Backlinks (31)
idtitletyperelationship
ai-welfareAI Welfare and Digital Mindsconcept—
reward-hacking-taxonomyReward Hacking Taxonomy and Severity Modelanalysisexample
automation-biasAutomation Bias (AI Systems)risk—
erosion-of-agencyErosion of Human Agencyrisk—
reward-hackingReward Hackingrisk—
language-modelsLarge Language Modelscapability—
misuse-risksAI Misuse Risk Cruxescrux—
why-alignment-hardWhy Alignment Might Be Hardargument—
compounding-risks-analysisCompounding Risks Analysisanalysis—
risk-activation-timelineRisk Activation Timeline Modelanalysis—
risk-cascade-pathwaysRisk Cascade Pathwaysanalysis—
risk-interaction-networkRisk Interaction Networkanalysis—
sycophancy-feedback-loopSycophancy Feedback Loop Modelanalysis—
goodfireGoodfireorganization—
ajeya-cotraAjeya Cotraperson—
chris-olahChris Olahperson—
alignment-evalsAlignment Evaluationsapproach—
alignmentAI Alignmentapproach—
debateAI Safety via Debateapproach—
epistemic-virtue-evalsEpistemic Virtue Evalsapproach—
goal-misgeneralization-researchGoal Misgeneralization Researchapproach—
mech-interpMechanistic Interpretabilityresearch-area—
process-supervisionProcess Supervisionapproach—
reward-modelingReward Modelingapproach—
sparse-autoencodersSparse Autoencoders (SAEs)approach—
accident-overviewAccident Risks (Overview)concept—
cyber-psychosisAI-Induced Cyber Psychosisrisk—
deceptive-alignmentDeceptive Alignmentrisk—
epistemic-sycophancyEpistemic Sycophancyrisk—
instrumental-convergenceInstrumental Convergencerisk—
rogue-ai-scenariosRogue AI Scenariosrisk—