Skip to content
Longterm Wiki

AI Alignment

alignmentapproachPath: /knowledge-base/responses/alignment/
E439Entity ID (EID)
← Back to page72 backlinksQuality: 91Updated: 2026-02-20
Page Recorddatabase.json — merged from MDX frontmatter + Entity YAML + computed metrics at build time
{
  "id": "alignment",
  "wikiId": "E439",
  "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/alignment/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/responses/alignment.mdx",
  "title": "AI Alignment",
  "quality": 91,
  "readerImportance": 95,
  "researchImportance": 35,
  "tacticalValue": 50,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "causalLevel": null,
  "lastUpdated": "2026-02-20",
  "dateCreated": "2026-02-15",
  "summary": "Comprehensive review of AI alignment approaches finding current methods (RLHF, Constitutional AI) show 75%+ effectiveness on measurable safety metrics for existing systems but face critical scalability challenges, with oversight success dropping to 52% at 400 Elo capability gaps and only 40-60% detection of sophisticated deception. Recent research demonstrates that safety classifiers embedded in aligned LLMs can be extracted using as little as 20% of model weights, achieving 70% attack success rates via surrogate models. Anthropic activated ASL-3 protections with Claude Opus 4 and established a National Security and Public Sector Advisory Council in August 2025. Expert consensus ranges from 10-60% probability of success for AGI alignment depending on approach and timelines.",
  "description": "Technical approaches to ensuring AI systems pursue intended goals and remain aligned with human values throughout training and deployment. Current methods show promise but face fundamental scalability challenges.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 5,
    "rigor": 7,
    "completeness": 7.5,
    "actionability": 6
  },
  "category": "responses",
  "subcategory": "alignment",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 5657,
    "tableCount": 14,
    "diagramCount": 2,
    "internalLinks": 103,
    "externalLinks": 31,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.1,
    "sectionCount": 36,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 15
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 100,
  "updateFrequency": 21,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 5657,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "AI Impacts 2024 survey",
      "url": "https://aiimpacts.org/2022-expert-survey-on-progress-in-ai/",
      "resourceId": "38eba87d0a888e2e",
      "resourceTitle": "AI experts show significant disagreement"
    },
    {
      "text": "FLI AI Safety Index Winter 2025",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/ai-safety-index-winter-2025/",
      "resourceId": "97185b28d68545b4",
      "resourceTitle": "AI Safety Index Winter 2025"
    },
    {
      "text": "Noirot Ferrand et al. (2025)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16534",
      "resourceId": "b97d5c85dbbacca3",
      "resourceTitle": "\"Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs\""
    },
    {
      "text": "Zou et al. (2023)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15043",
      "resourceId": "302c069146f3f6f2",
      "resourceTitle": "[2307.15043] Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models"
    },
    {
      "text": "Future of Life Institute's AI Safety Index",
      "url": "https://futureoflife.org/ai-safety-index-winter-2025/",
      "resourceId": "97185b28d68545b4",
      "resourceTitle": "AI Safety Index Winter 2025"
    },
    {
      "text": "\"Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs\"",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16534",
      "resourceId": "b97d5c85dbbacca3",
      "resourceTitle": "\"Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs\""
    },
    {
      "text": "activated ASL-3 Deployment and Security Standards",
      "url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/activating-asl3-protections",
      "resourceId": "7512ddb574f82249",
      "resourceTitle": "Activating AI Safety Level 3 protections"
    },
    {
      "text": "CVPR 2024",
      "url": "https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2024/papers/Yu_RLHF-V_Towards_Trustworthy_MLLMs_via_Behavior_Alignment_from_Fine-grained_Correctional_CVPR_2024_paper.pdf",
      "resourceId": "108f52553230c4d5",
      "resourceTitle": "RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy Multimodal LLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedback"
    },
    {
      "text": "Zou et al. (2023)",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15043",
      "resourceId": "302c069146f3f6f2",
      "resourceTitle": "[2307.15043] Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models"
    },
    {
      "text": "AI Impacts 2024 survey",
      "url": "https://aiimpacts.org/2022-expert-survey-on-progress-in-ai/",
      "resourceId": "38eba87d0a888e2e",
      "resourceTitle": "AI experts show significant disagreement"
    },
    {
      "text": "Metaculus",
      "url": "https://www.metaculus.com/",
      "resourceId": "d99a6d0fb1edc2db",
      "resourceTitle": "Metaculus Forecasting Platform"
    },
    {
      "text": "Metaculus",
      "url": "https://www.metaculus.com/",
      "resourceId": "d99a6d0fb1edc2db",
      "resourceTitle": "Metaculus Forecasting Platform"
    },
    {
      "text": "Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16534",
      "resourceId": "b97d5c85dbbacca3",
      "resourceTitle": "\"Targeting Alignment: Extracting Safety Classifiers of Aligned LLMs\""
    },
    {
      "text": "Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15043",
      "resourceId": "302c069146f3f6f2",
      "resourceTitle": "[2307.15043] Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models"
    },
    {
      "text": "Safety Misalignment Against Large Language Models",
      "url": "https://www.ndss-symposium.org/wp-content/uploads/2025-1089-paper.pdf",
      "resourceId": "3a7a904debb5b65f",
      "resourceTitle": "Safety Misalignment Against Large Language Models"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 15,
  "convertedLinkCount": 49,
  "backlinkCount": 72,
  "citationHealth": {
    "total": 12,
    "withQuotes": 9,
    "verified": 7,
    "accuracyChecked": 7,
    "accurate": 6,
    "inaccurate": 1,
    "avgScore": 0.7998268281420072
  },
  "hallucinationRisk": {
    "level": "low",
    "score": 25,
    "factors": [
      "no-citations",
      "high-rigor",
      "conceptual-content",
      "high-quality"
    ]
  },
  "entityType": "approach",
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 20,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "accident-risks",
        "title": "AI Accident Risk Cruxes",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/accident-risks/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "why-alignment-hard",
        "title": "Why Alignment Might Be Hard",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/debates/why-alignment-hard/",
        "similarity": 20
      },
      {
        "id": "agentic-ai",
        "title": "Agentic AI",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/capabilities/agentic-ai/",
        "similarity": 19
      },
      {
        "id": "solutions",
        "title": "AI Safety Solution Cruxes",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/cruxes/solutions/",
        "similarity": 19
      },
      {
        "id": "interpretability",
        "title": "Mechanistic Interpretability",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/responses/interpretability/",
        "similarity": 19
      }
    ]
  },
  "changeHistory": [
    {
      "date": "2026-02-18",
      "branch": "claude/fix-issue-240-N5irU",
      "title": "Surface tacticalValue in /wiki table and score 53 pages",
      "summary": "Added `tacticalValue` to `ExploreItem` interface, `getExploreItems()` mappings, the `/wiki` explore table (new sortable \"Tact.\" column), and the card view sort dropdown. Scored 49 new pages with tactical values (4 were already scored), bringing total to 53.",
      "model": "sonnet-4",
      "duration": "~30min"
    }
  ],
  "coverage": {
    "passing": 10,
    "total": 13,
    "targets": {
      "tables": 23,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 45,
      "externalLinks": 28,
      "footnotes": 17,
      "references": 17
    },
    "actuals": {
      "tables": 14,
      "diagrams": 2,
      "internalLinks": 103,
      "externalLinks": 31,
      "footnotes": 0,
      "references": 38,
      "quotesWithQuotes": 9,
      "quotesTotal": 12,
      "accuracyChecked": 7,
      "accuracyTotal": 12
    },
    "items": {
      "summary": "green",
      "schedule": "green",
      "entity": "green",
      "editHistory": "green",
      "overview": "green",
      "tables": "amber",
      "diagrams": "green",
      "internalLinks": "green",
      "externalLinks": "green",
      "footnotes": "red",
      "references": "green",
      "quotes": "green",
      "accuracy": "amber"
    },
    "editHistoryCount": 1,
    "ratingsString": "N:5 R:7 A:6 C:7.5"
  },
  "readerRank": 1,
  "researchRank": 374,
  "recommendedScore": 238.8
}
External Links
{
  "wikipedia": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_alignment",
  "lesswrong": "https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/ai",
  "eaForum": "https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/ai-alignment",
  "stampy": "https://aisafety.info/questions/9Tii/What-is-AI-alignment",
  "arbital": "https://arbital.greaterwrong.com/p/ai_alignment",
  "wikidata": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q24882728",
  "eightyK": "https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/artificial-intelligence/",
  "grokipedia": "https://grokipedia.com/page/AI_alignment"
}
Backlinks (72)
idtitletyperelationship
ai-welfareAI Welfare and Digital Mindsconcept—
palisade-researchPalisade Researchorganization—
marc-andreessenMarc Andreessenperson—
constitutional-aiConstitutional AIapproach—
agentic-aiAgentic AIcapability—
accident-risksAI Accident Risk Cruxescrux—
solutionsAI Safety Solution Cruxescrux—
miri-eraThe MIRI Era (2000-2015)historical—
openclaw-matplotlib-incident-2026OpenClaw Matplotlib Incident (2026)concept—
alignment-robustness-trajectoryAlignment Robustness Trajectoryanalysis—
disinformation-detection-raceDisinformation Detection Arms Race Modelanalysis—
intervention-timing-windowsIntervention Timing Windowsanalysis—
model-organisms-of-misalignmentModel Organisms of Misalignmentanalysis—
reward-hacking-taxonomyReward Hacking Taxonomy and Severity Modelanalysis—
anthropic-investorsAnthropic (Funder)analysis—
arb-researchArb Researchorganization—
bridgewater-aia-labsBridgewater AIA Labsorganization—
caisCenter for AI Safety (CAIS)organization—
center-for-applied-rationalityCenter for Applied Rationalityorganization—
conjectureConjectureorganization—
ea-globalEA Globalorganization—
elicitElicit (AI Research Tool)organization—
fhiFuture of Humanity Institute (FHI)organization—
fliFuture of Life Institute (FLI)organization—
frontier-model-forumFrontier Model Forumorganization—
goodfireGoodfireorganization—
lesswrongLessWrongorganization—
lighthavenLighthaven (Event Venue)organization—
lightning-rod-labsLightning Rod Labsorganization—
lionheart-venturesLionheart Venturesorganization—
manifestManifest (Forecasting Conference)organization—
matsMATS ML Alignment Theory Scholars programorganization—
miriMachine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)organization—
nist-aiNIST and AI Safetyorganization—
openaiOpenAIorganization—
pause-aiPause AIorganization—
safety-orgs-overviewAI Safety Organizations (Overview)concept—
secure-ai-projectSecure AI Projectorganization—
seldon-labSeldon Laborganization—
swift-centreSwift Centreorganization—
the-sequencesThe Sequences by Eliezer Yudkowskyorganization—
varaValue Aligned Research Advisorsorganization—
xaixAIorganization—
connor-leahyConnor Leahyperson—
eliezer-yudkowskyEliezer Yudkowskyperson—
elon-muskElon Muskperson—
evan-hubingerEvan Hubingerperson—
holden-karnofskyHolden Karnofskyperson—
leopold-aschenbrennerLeopold Aschenbrennerperson—
neel-nandaNeel Nandaperson—
paul-christianoPaul Christianoperson—
vidur-kapurVidur Kapurperson—
vipul-naikVipul Naikperson—
ai-watchAI Watchproject—
canada-aidaCanada AIDApolicy—
cirlCooperative IRL (CIRL)approach—
coe-ai-conventionCouncil of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligencepolicy—
compute-governanceCompute Governance: AI Chips Export Controls Policyconcept—
corporateCorporate AI Safety Responsesapproach—
eu-ai-actEU AI Actpolicy—
evaluationAI Evaluationapproach—
new-york-raise-actNew York RAISE Actpolicy—
prediction-marketsPrediction Markets (AI Forecasting)approach—
rlhfRLHF / Constitutional AIresearch-area—
scalable-oversightScalable Oversightresearch-area—
training-programsAI Safety Training Programsapproach—
wikipedia-and-aiWikipedia and AI Contentconcept—
distributional-shiftAI Distributional Shiftrisk—
lock-inAI Value Lock-inrisk—
mesa-optimizationMesa-Optimizationrisk—
sharp-left-turnSharp Left Turnrisk—
doomerAI Doomer Worldviewconcept—