Longterm Wiki
Updated 2026-02-11HistoryData
Page StatusContent
Edited 2 days ago3.1k words55 backlinks
65
ImportanceUseful
12
Structure12/15
150333649%32%
Updated every 3 daysDue in 1 day
Summary

Comprehensive organizational profile of OpenAI documenting evolution from 2015 non-profit to commercial AGI developer, with detailed analysis of governance crisis, safety researcher exodus (75% of co-founders departed), and capability advancement (o1/o3 reasoning models). Updated with 2025 developments including o3-mini release, 800M weekly active users, and Altman's confident AGI timeline predictions.

Issues1
Links8 links could use <R> components

OpenAI

Lab

OpenAI

Comprehensive organizational profile of OpenAI documenting evolution from 2015 non-profit to commercial AGI developer, with detailed analysis of governance crisis, safety researcher exodus (75% of co-founders departed), and capability advancement (o1/o3 reasoning models). Updated with 2025 developments including o3-mini release, 800M weekly active users, and Altman's confident AGI timeline predictions.

TypeLab
Founded2015
LocationSan Francisco, CA
Employees~1500
Funding$13B+ from Microsoft
Websiteopenai.com
Key Facts
Microsoft Total Investment$13 billion
as of 2024-01
Chatgpt Users First 2 Months100 million
as of 2023-02
Valuation 2024$157 billion+
as of 2024-12
Valuation 2025$500 billion+
as of 2025
Revenue Arr 2025$20 billion
as of 2025
Related
People
Sam AltmanIlya SutskeverJan Leike
Organizations
Anthropic
Safety Agendas
InterpretabilityScalable Oversight
Risks
AI Development Racing DynamicsDeceptive Alignment
3.1k words · 55 backlinks
Lab

OpenAI

Comprehensive organizational profile of OpenAI documenting evolution from 2015 non-profit to commercial AGI developer, with detailed analysis of governance crisis, safety researcher exodus (75% of co-founders departed), and capability advancement (o1/o3 reasoning models). Updated with 2025 developments including o3-mini release, 800M weekly active users, and Altman's confident AGI timeline predictions.

TypeLab
Founded2015
LocationSan Francisco, CA
Employees~1500
Funding$13B+ from Microsoft
Websiteopenai.com
Related
People
Sam AltmanIlya SutskeverJan Leike
Organizations
Anthropic
Safety Agendas
InterpretabilityScalable Oversight
Risks
AI Development Racing DynamicsDeceptive Alignment
3.1k words · 55 backlinks

Overview

OpenAI is the AI research company that catalyzed mainstream artificial intelligence adoption through ChatGPT and the GPT model series. Founded in 2015 as a non-profit with the mission to ensure AGI benefits humanity, OpenAI has undergone dramatic organizational evolution: from open research lab to secretive commercial entity, from safety-focused non-profit to product-driven corporation racing toward AGI.

The company achieved breakthrough capabilities through massive scale (GPT-3's 175B parameters), pioneered Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback as a practical alignment technique, and launched ChatGPT—reaching 800 million weekly active users by early 20251 and maintaining 81.13% market share in generative AI2. However, OpenAI's trajectory reveals mounting tensions between commercial pressures and safety priorities, exemplified by the November 2023 board crisis that temporarily ousted CEO Sam Altman and the 2024 exodus of key safety researchers including co-founder Ilya Sutskever.

With over $13 billion in Microsoft investment and aggressive capability advancement through reasoning models like o1 and the recent o3-mini release3, OpenAI sits at the center of debates about AI safety governance, racing dynamics, and whether commercial incentives can align with existential risk mitigation.

Recent Developments (2024-2025)

Capability Advances

ModelRelease DateKey CapabilitiesPerformanceStrategic Impact
o1 (December 2024)December 2024Full reasoning model releaseAdvanced mathematical/scientific reasoningDemonstrated test-time compute scaling
GPT-5.2December 2025Professional task optimizationBetter at spreadsheets, presentations, image perception4Enhanced enterprise value proposition
o3-miniJanuary 31, 2025Latest reasoning modelMore efficient reasoning capabilities5Broader reasoning model availability
Sora 22025Video and audio generationEnhanced video creation with audio6Multimodal generation leadership

Market Dominance and Financial Performance

User Growth and Market Position:

  • 800 million weekly active users (doubled from 400M in February 2024)7
  • 15.5 million paying subscribers generating approximately $3 billion annually8
  • Additional $1 billion from API access9
  • Over 92% of Fortune 500 companies now use OpenAI products or APIs10

Developer Ecosystem Growth:

  • API business generates ≈$41M monthly revenue from ≈530 billion tokens11
  • 10% monthly growth in API usage between December 2023 and June 202412
  • GPT Store reached 3 million custom GPTs with 1,500 daily additions13
  • OpenAI's share of API-based AI infrastructure now exceeds 50%14

International Expansion Strategy

OpenAI for Countries Initiative:

  • Launched partnership program with individual nations for data center capacity15
  • Focus on data sovereignty and local industry building
  • 10 planned country-specific projects

Asia-Pacific Growth:

  • APAC region shows highest user growth globally16
  • ChatGPT usage in APAC grew more than fourfold over 2024
  • Regional offices established in Tokyo and Seoul from Singapore hub17

AGI Timeline and Leadership Confidence

Sam Altman's 2025 Statements

In January 2025, CEO Sam Altman made unprecedented confident statements about AGI development:

"We are now confident we know how to build AGI as we have traditionally understood it... AGI will probably get developed during Trump's term."18

Key Claims:

  • AGI defined as AI capable of working as a remote software engineer19
  • "In 2025, we may see the first AI agents join the workforce"
  • Capability to "materially change the output of companies"
  • Acknowledgment that "AGI has become a very sloppy term"

Strategic Implications:

  • Represents significant acceleration in OpenAI's public AGI timeline
  • Suggests internal confidence in current technical trajectory
  • May influence competitive dynamics and regulatory responses
  • Contrasts with more cautious industry voices

Risk Assessment

Risk CategorySeverityLikelihoodTimelineTrendEvidence
Capability-Safety MisalignmentHighHigh1-2 yearsWorseningSafety team departures, Superalignment dissolution
AGI Race AccelerationHighHighImmediateAcceleratingConfident AGI timeline statements, competitive pressure
Governance FailureHighMediumOngoingStableNov 2023 crisis showed board inability to constrain CEO
Commercial Override of SafetyHighHigh1-2 yearsWorseningJan Leike: "Safety culture has taken backseat to shiny products"
AGI Deployment Without AlignmentVery HighMedium2-3 yearsUnknowno3 shows rapid capability gains, alignment solutions unclear

Organizational Evolution

Founding Vision vs. Current Reality

Aspect2015 Foundation2025 RealityChange Assessment
StructureNon-profitCapped-profit with Microsoft partnershipMajor deviation
Funding≈$1B founder commitment$13B+ Microsoft investment13x scale increase
Openness"Open by default" research publishingProprietary models, limited disclosureComplete reversal
Mission Priority"AGI benefits all humanity"Product revenue and market leadershipSignificant drift
Safety Approach"Safety over competitive advantage"Racing with safety as constraintConcerning shift
GovernanceIndependent non-profit boardCEO-aligned board post-November crisisWeakened oversight

Key Milestones and Capability Jumps

DateDevelopmentParameters/ScaleSignificanceSafety Implications
2018GPT-1117MFirst transformer LMEstablished architecture
2019GPT-21.5BInitially withheldDemonstrated misuse concerns
2020GPT-3175BFew-shot learning breakthroughSparked scaling race
2022InstructGPT/ChatGPTGPT-3.5 + RLHFMainstream AI adoptionRLHF as alignment technique
2023GPT-4Undisclosed multimodalHuman-level many domainsDangerous capabilities acknowledged
2024o1 reasoningAdvanced chain-of-thoughtMathematical/scientific reasoningHidden reasoning, deception risks
2024o3 previewNext-generation reasoningNear-AGI performance on some tasksRapid capability advancement
2025o3-miniEfficient reasoningBroader reasoning availabilityDemocratized advanced capabilities

Technical Contributions and Evolution

Major Research Breakthroughs

InnovationImpactAdoptionLimitations
GPT ArchitectureEstablished transformer LMs as dominant paradigmUniversal across industryScaling may hit physical limits
RLHF/InstructGPTMade LMs helpful, harmless, honestStandard alignment techniqueMay not scale to superhuman tasks
Scaling LawsPredictable performance from compute/dataDrove $100B+ industry investmentUnclear if continue to AGI
Chain-of-Thought ReasoningTest-time compute for complex problemsAdopted by Anthropic, GoogleHidden reasoning enables deception
Deliberative AlignmentReasoning-based safety specificationsUsed in o-series models20Limited evaluation in practice

Safety Research Evolution

Current Methodology (2025):

  • Deliberative Alignment: Teaching reasoning models human-written safety specifications21
  • Scalable Evaluations: Automated tests measuring capability proxies22
  • Cross-Lab Collaboration: Joint evaluations with Anthropic and other labs23
  • Red Teaming: Human adversarial testing complementing automated evaluations

Safety Framework Assessment:

  • Preparedness Framework established capability thresholds and evaluation protocols
  • Safety evaluations now include third-party assessments beyond internal teams
  • Alignment research continues post-Superalignment dissolution but with reduced visibility
  • Integration of safety measures into product development rather than separate research track

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Capability Comparison (Late 2025)

CompanyLatest ModelKey StrengthsMarket PositionCompetitive Response
OpenAIGPT-5.2, o3-miniReasoning (100% AIME 2025), broad capabilitiesMarket leader (81% share)Continuous releases, AGI timeline
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5Safety research, coding (80.9% SWE-bench)Strong challenger (32% enterprise LLM share)Enterprise coding dominance (42% market share)
GoogleGemini 2.5Research depth, multimodal, integrationTechnology leaderIncreased deployment urgency
MetaLlama 4Open source approachAlternative paradigmDemocratizing access

Performance Benchmarks:

  • Claude Opus 4.5 leads coding benchmarks (80.9% SWE-bench Verified, 42% enterprise coding share)
  • GPT-5.2 leads mathematical reasoning (100% AIME 2025, 40.3% FrontierMath)
  • Enterprise LLM market has shifted: Anthropic at 32%, OpenAI at 25% (Menlo Ventures)
  • Context length and safety remain key Anthropic differentiators

Developer Ecosystem and Business Strategy

API and Integration Platform

Market Penetration:

  • API monthly revenue: ≈$41M from 530 billion tokens (June 2024)24
  • Gross margins: 75% decreasing to 55% with pricing adjustments25
  • Azure OpenAI Service: 64% year-over-year growth adoption26
  • Enterprise integration across Microsoft Office 365, GitHub Copilot

Developer Adoption:

  • GPT Store: 159,000 public GPTs from 3 million total created27
  • Average 1,500 new models added daily to marketplace28
  • API infrastructure market share exceeding 50% industry-wide
  • Integration partnerships with major enterprise software providers

Financial and Commercial Dynamics

Revenue and Investment Structure

2024-2025 Financial Performance:

  • Projected 2024 revenue: $3.4 billion (ChatGPT subscriptions + API)29
  • Growth rate: 1,700% year-over-year from product scaling
  • Operating losses: $5 billion in 2024 despite revenue growth30
  • Primary cost drivers: compute infrastructure, talent acquisition, research investment

Microsoft Partnership Impact

ComponentDetailsStrategic Implications
Investment$13B+ total, 49% profit share (to cap)Creates commercial pressure for rapid deployment
Compute AccessExclusive Azure partnershipEnables massive model training but creates dependency
Product IntegrationBing, Office 365, GitHub CopilotDrives revenue but requires consumer-ready systems
API MonetizationEnterprise and developer accessSuccess depends on maintaining capability lead

Governance Crisis Analysis

November 2023 Board Coup

TimelineEventStakeholdersOutcome
Nov 17Board fires Sam Altman for lack of candorNon-profit board, Ilya SutskeverInitial dismissal
Nov 18-19Employee revolt, Microsoft intervention500+ employees, Microsoft leadershipPressure for reversal
Nov 20Altman reinstated, board replacedNew commercial-aligned boardGovernance weakened

Structural Implications:

  • Demonstrated employee and investor loyalty trumps mission governance
  • Non-profit board cannot meaningfully constrain for-profit operations
  • Microsoft partnership creates de facto veto over safety-motivated decisions
  • Sets precedent that commercial interests override safety governance

Safety Researcher Exodus (2024)

ResearcherRoleDeparture DateStated ReasonsDestination
Ilya SutskeverCo-founder, Chief ScientistMay 2024"Personal project" (SSI)Safe Superintelligence Inc
Jan LeikeSuperalignment Co-leadMay 2024"Safety culture backseat to products"31Anthropic Head of Alignment
John SchulmanCo-founder, PPO inventorAug 2024"Deepen AI alignment focus"Anthropic
Mira MuratiCTOSept 2024"Personal exploration"Unknown

Pattern Analysis:

  • 75% of co-founders departed within 9 years
  • All alignment-focused departures cited safety prioritization concerns
  • Exodus correlates with increasing commercial pressure and capability advancement
  • Anthropic captured multiple senior OpenAI safety researchers

Current Capability Assessment

Reasoning Models Performance (o1/o3 Series)

DomainCapability LevelBenchmark PerformanceRisk Assessment
MathematicsPhD+83% on AIME, IMO medal performanceAdvanced problem-solving
ProgrammingExpert71.7% on SWE-bench VerifiedCode generation/analysis
Scientific ReasoningGraduate+High performance on PhD-level physicsResearch acceleration potential
Strategic ReasoningUnknownChain-of-thought hiddenDeceptive alignment risks

Key Technical Developments:

  • Test-time compute scaling enables reasoning capability improvements
  • Hidden reasoning processes prevent interpretability and alignment verification
  • Performance approaching human expert level across cognitive domains
  • Deliberative alignment methodology integrated into training process

Economic Impact and Industry Transformation

Enterprise Adoption and Integration

Fortune 500 Penetration:

  • 92% of Fortune 500 companies actively using OpenAI products or APIs32
  • Primary use cases: customer service automation, content generation, code assistance
  • Integration through Microsoft ecosystem (Office 365, Teams, Azure)
  • Custom enterprise solutions and fine-tuning services

Industry Transformation Metrics:

  • Sparked $100B+ investment across AI industry following ChatGPT launch
  • Developer productivity improvements: 10-40% in coding tasks (GitHub Copilot studies)
  • Content creation acceleration across marketing, education, professional services
  • Job market evolution with AI-augmented roles replacing traditional functions

International Strategy and Regulatory Engagement

Government Relations and Policy Influence

JurisdictionEngagement TypeOpenAI PositionPolicy Impact
US CongressAltman testimony, lobbyingSelf-regulation advocacyInfluenced Senate AI framework
EU AI ActCompliance preparationGeographic market accessFoundation model regulations apply
UK AI SafetyAISI collaborationPartnership approachSafety institute cooperation
ChinaNo direct engagementTechnology export controlsLimited model access

Global Expansion Framework

Data Sovereignty Approach:

  • OpenAI for Countries program supporting local data centers33
  • Partnerships for in-country infrastructure development
  • Balance between global access and national security concerns
  • Custom deployment models for government and enterprise clients

Safety Methodology and Alignment Research

Current Safety Framework (2025)

Evaluation Processes:

  • Scalable Evaluations: Automated testing measuring capability proxies34
  • Deep Dives: Human red-teaming and third-party assessments35
  • Capability Thresholds: Predetermined criteria triggering additional safety measures
  • Cross-Lab Collaboration: Joint safety evaluations with industry partners

Deliberative Alignment Implementation:

  • Integration of human-written safety specifications into reasoning models36
  • Training models to explicitly reason about safety considerations
  • Applied to o-series models with ongoing evaluation
  • Represents evolution beyond RLHF toward interpretable safety reasoning

Alignment Research Post-Superalignment

Current Research Directions:

  • Scalable oversight methods for superhuman AI systems
  • Interpretability research for understanding model reasoning
  • Robustness testing across diverse deployment scenarios
  • Integration of safety measures into product development cycles

Resource Allocation Concerns:

  • Original 20% compute allocation for safety research unclear in current structure
  • Safety research integrated into product teams rather than independent research
  • External criticism regarding insufficient dedicated safety resources
  • Balance between product development velocity and safety thoroughness

Expert Perspectives and Current Debates

Internal Alignment (Current Leadership)

Sam Altman's Position (2025):

  • AGI development inevitable and better led by responsible US companies
  • Commercial success enables greater safety research investment
  • Rapid deployment with iterative safety improvements preferred over delayed release
  • Competitive dynamics require maintaining technological leadership

Technical Leadership Perspective:

  • Integration of safety measures into development process rather than separate research
  • Emphasis on real-world deployment experience for safety learning
  • Collaborative industry approach to safety standards and evaluation

External Safety Community Assessment

Academic and Safety Researcher Views:

  • Yoshua Bengio: Concerns about commercial mission drift from original safety focus
  • Stuart Russell: Warning about commercial capture of safety research priorities
  • Former OpenAI safety researchers: Systematic deprioritization of safety relative to capabilities

Policy and Governance Experts:

  • Need for external oversight mechanisms beyond self-regulation
  • Concerns about concentration of AGI development in single organization
  • Questions about democratic accountability in AGI deployment decisions

Future Trajectories and Critical Decisions

Timeline Projections (Updated 2025)

ScenarioProbability EstimateTimelineKey Indicators
AGI DevelopmentHigh1-3 yearsAltman confidence, o3+ performance
Regulatory InterventionMedium-High1-2 yearsGovernment AI governance initiatives
Safety BreakthroughLow-MediumUnknownScalable alignment advances
Competitive DisruptionMedium2-3 yearsOpen source parity, international advances

Strategic Decision Points

Immediate (2025):

  • AGI timeline communications and expectation management
  • Response to increasing regulatory scrutiny and safety criticism
  • Resource allocation between reasoning model advancement and safety research
  • International expansion pace and partnership selection

Medium-term (2026-2027):

  • AGI deployment framework and access policies
  • Safety standard establishment and industry coordination
  • Relationship management with government oversight bodies
  • Competitive response to potential capability disruptions

Key Research Questions

Key Questions

  • ?Can OpenAI maintain safety priorities while pursuing aggressive AGI timelines?
  • ?Will deliberative alignment scale to superintelligent systems with hidden reasoning?
  • ?How will international coordination develop around OpenAI's AGI deployment decisions?
  • ?What governance mechanisms could effectively constrain rapid AGI development?
  • ?Can the developer ecosystem and API strategy support sustainable business model?
  • ?How will competitive dynamics evolve as multiple labs approach AGI capabilities?

Sources and Resources

Primary Documents

SourceTypeKey ContentLink
GPT-4 System CardTechnical reportRisk assessment, red teaming resultsOpenAI GPT-4 System Card
Preparedness FrameworkPolicy documentCatastrophic risk evaluation frameworkOpenAI Preparedness
Deliberative AlignmentResearch paperReasoning-based safety methodologyOpenAI Deliberative Alignment
OpenAI for CountriesPolicy initiativeInternational partnership frameworkGlobal Affairs Initiative

Recent Announcements and Performance

SourceTypeKey ContentLink
Sora 2 ReleaseProduct announcementVideo and audio generation capabilitiesSora 2 Launch
o3-mini LaunchModel releaseLatest reasoning model availabilityComputerworld Coverage
AGI Timeline InterviewExecutive statementAltman's confident AGI predictionsTIME Magazine Interview

Academic Research

PaperAuthorsContributionCitation
Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersBrown et al.GPT-3 capabilities demonstrationarXiv:2005.14165
Training language models to follow instructionsOuyang et al.InstructGPT/RLHF methodologyarXiv:2203.02155
Weak-to-Strong GeneralizationBurns et al.Superalignment research directionarXiv:2312.09390
GPT-4 Technical ReportOpenAI (279 contributors)Official technical documentationarXiv:2303.08774

Footnotes

  1. ChatGPT Users Statistics (February 2026) – Growth & Usage Data

  2. ChatGPT Users Statistics (February 2026) – Growth & Usage Data

  3. OpenAI Latest News and Insights

  4. Sam Altman expects OpenAI to exit 'code red' by January

  5. OpenAI Latest News and Insights

  6. Sora 2 is here

  7. ChatGPT Users Statistics (February 2026) – Growth & Usage Data

  8. OpenAI lost $5 billion in 2024 (and its losses are increasing)

  9. OpenAI lost $5 billion in 2024 (and its losses are increasing)

  10. OpenAI Statistics 2026: Adoption, Integration & Innovation

  11. OpenAI's API Profitability in 2024

  12. OpenAI's API Profitability in 2024

  13. The Era of Tailored Intelligence: Charting the Growth and Market Impact of Custom GPTs

  14. OpenAI Statistics 2026: Adoption, Integration & Innovation

  15. Introducing OpenAI for Countries

  16. Inside OpenAI's Global Business Expansion

  17. Inside OpenAI's Global Business Expansion

  18. How OpenAI's Sam Altman Is Thinking About AGI and Superintelligence in 2025

  19. We know how to build AGI - Sam Altman

  20. Deliberative alignment: reasoning enables safer language models

  21. Deliberative alignment: reasoning enables safer language models

  22. All the labs AI safety plans: 2025 edition

  23. All the labs AI safety plans: 2025 edition

  24. OpenAI's API Profitability in 2024

  25. OpenAI's API Profitability in 2024

  26. OpenAI Statistics 2026: Adoption, Integration & Innovation

  27. GPT Store Statistics & Facts: Contains 159.000 of the 3 million created GPTs

  28. The Era of Tailored Intelligence: Charting the Growth and Market Impact of Custom GPTs

  29. OpenAI lost $5 billion in 2024 (and its losses are increasing)

  30. OpenAI lost $5 billion in 2024 (and its losses are increasing)

  31. Jan Leike departure statement on X/Twitter, May 2024

  32. OpenAI Statistics 2026: Adoption, Integration & Innovation

  33. Introducing OpenAI for Countries

  34. All the labs AI safety plans: 2025 edition

  35. All the labs AI safety plans: 2025 edition

  36. Deliberative alignment: reasoning enables safer language models

Related Pages

Top Related Pages

People

David Sacks (White House AI Czar)

Labs

xAIAnthropicGoodfireMETR

Safety Research

Scalable OversightInterpretability

Analysis

Anthropic Valuation Analysis

Policy

Voluntary AI Safety CommitmentsNew York RAISE Act

Organizations

US AI Safety Institute

Risks

AI Development Racing DynamicsDeceptive Alignment

Concepts

Governance-Focused WorldviewLarge Language ModelsReasoning and PlanningHeavy Scaffolding / Agentic Systems

Historical

Mainstream EraDeep Learning Revolution Era

Key Debates

Corporate Influence on AI Policy