Skip to content
Longterm Wiki
Back

Climate Endgame Paper - PNAS

web

Credibility Rating

5/5
Gold(5)

Gold standard. Rigorous peer review, high editorial standards, and strong institutional reputation.

Rating inherited from publication venue: PNAS

Though focused on climate rather than AI, this paper is relevant to AI safety researchers interested in existential risk frameworks, catastrophic tail-risk analysis, and multi-domain civilizational threats that could interact with or complicate AI governance efforts.

Metadata

Importance: 45/100journal articleprimary source

Summary

This PNAS paper examines severely underexplored catastrophic and existential risks from climate change, arguing that worst-case scenarios including societal collapse and human extinction deserve serious scientific attention. The authors call for a dedicated research agenda on 'Climate Endgame' scenarios involving 3°C or more of warming, cascading risks, and interactions with other global stressors. It parallels existential risk frameworks common in AI safety discourse.

Key Points

  • Argues that catastrophic climate scenarios (>3°C warming) are neglected in mainstream research despite potentially civilization-ending consequences
  • Introduces concept of 'Climate Endgame' to capture tail risks including societal collapse and potential human extinction from climate change
  • Identifies four key risk factors: food system shocks, extreme weather, conflict, and vector-borne diseases interacting in cascading ways
  • Calls for a formal research agenda on catastrophic climate risk analogous to existential risk research in other fields
  • Relevant to AI safety community as a model for tail-risk analysis and cross-domain catastrophic risk thinking

Cited by 1 page

Cached Content Preview

HTTP 200Fetched Mar 20, 20260 KB
### Sign up for the_PNAS Highlights_ newsletter

[Subscribe for Research Updates](https://www.pnas.org/pnas-highlights)
Resource ID: 41f7d6233b41788d | Stable ID: NjFmOWUwZD