Anthropic Valuation Analysis

{
  "id": "anthropic-valuation",
  "numericId": null,
  "path": "/knowledge-base/organizations/anthropic-valuation/",
  "filePath": "knowledge-base/organizations/anthropic-valuation.mdx",
  "title": "Anthropic Valuation Analysis",
  "quality": 72,
  "importance": 78,
  "contentFormat": "article",
  "tractability": null,
  "neglectedness": null,
  "uncertainty": null,
  "causalLevel": null,
  "lastUpdated": "2026-02-13",
  "llmSummary": "Valuation analysis updated for Series G (Feb 2026). Anthropic raised $30B at $380B post-money with $14B run-rate revenue, yielding ~27x multiple—now closer to OpenAI's 25x at $500B/$20B. Bull case rests on 88% enterprise retention (vs 76% industry), coding benchmark leadership (80.9% SWE-bench vs GPT-5.2's 74.9%), 500+ million-dollar customers, and dual AWS/Google Cloud partnerships worth tens of billions. Bear case includes severe customer concentration (≈$1.2B or 25%+ from Cursor and GitHub Copilot alone), margin compression (forecast cut from 50% to 40%), and bubble warnings—Sam Altman admits 'AI bubble is ongoing.' Extended scenarios model 1.5-5x growth ($500B-$1.75T) with revised probabilities.",
  "structuredSummary": null,
  "description": "Analysis of Anthropic's $380B valuation (Series G, Feb 2026). With $14B run-rate revenue, Anthropic now trades at ~27x—closer to OpenAI's 25x. Bull case: 88% enterprise retention, coding benchmark leadership, dual cloud partnerships. Bear case: 25% customer concentration in Cursor/GitHub, margin pressure (50%→40%), AI bubble warnings from Sam Altman himself.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 6,
    "rigor": 7,
    "actionability": 6,
    "completeness": 7,
    "concreteness": 8
  },
  "category": "organizations",
  "subcategory": "finance",
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "metrics": {
    "wordCount": 2182,
    "tableCount": 18,
    "diagramCount": 1,
    "internalLinks": 11,
    "externalLinks": 21,
    "footnoteCount": 0,
    "bulletRatio": 0.13,
    "sectionCount": 28,
    "hasOverview": true,
    "structuralScore": 14
  },
  "suggestedQuality": 93,
  "updateFrequency": 21,
  "evergreen": true,
  "wordCount": 2182,
  "unconvertedLinks": [
    {
      "text": "LM Council",
      "url": "https://lmcouncil.ai/benchmarks",
      "resourceId": "1d344f96978e2edf",
      "resourceTitle": "AI Model Benchmarks - LM Council"
    }
  ],
  "unconvertedLinkCount": 1,
  "convertedLinkCount": 0,
  "backlinkCount": 3,
  "redundancy": {
    "maxSimilarity": 14,
    "similarPages": [
      {
        "id": "ai-revenue-sources",
        "title": "AI Revenue Sources",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/organizations/ai-revenue-sources/",
        "similarity": 14
      },
      {
        "id": "anthropic-ipo",
        "title": "Anthropic IPO",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/organizations/anthropic-ipo/",
        "similarity": 14
      },
      {
        "id": "frontier-ai-comparison",
        "title": "Frontier AI Company Comparison (2026)",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/organizations/frontier-ai-comparison/",
        "similarity": 13
      },
      {
        "id": "anthropic-investors",
        "title": "Anthropic (Funder)",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/organizations/anthropic-investors/",
        "similarity": 12
      },
      {
        "id": "openai",
        "title": "OpenAI",
        "path": "/knowledge-base/organizations/openai/",
        "similarity": 12
      }
    ]
  }
}

{
  "id": "anthropic-valuation",
  "type": "analysis",
  "title": "Anthropic Valuation Analysis",
  "description": "Analysis of Anthropic's $350B valuation. Corrected data shows Anthropic trades at 39x revenue vs OpenAI's 25x. Bull case: 88% enterprise retention, coding benchmark leadership. Bear case: 25% customer concentration, margin pressure, AI bubble warnings.",
  "tags": [
    "anthropic",
    "valuation",
    "revenue-multiples",
    "enterprise-metrics",
    "ai-industry-finance"
  ],
  "relatedEntries": [
    {
      "id": "anthropic",
      "type": "lab"
    },
    {
      "id": "anthropic-ipo",
      "type": "analysis"
    },
    {
      "id": "anthropic-investors",
      "type": "analysis"
    },
    {
      "id": "openai",
      "type": "lab"
    }
  ],
  "sources": [],
  "lastUpdated": "2026-02",
  "customFields": []
}

No facts for this entity

No external links

{
  "title": "Anthropic Valuation Analysis",
  "description": "Analysis of Anthropic's $380B valuation (Series G, Feb 2026). With $14B run-rate revenue, Anthropic now trades at ~27x—closer to OpenAI's 25x. Bull case: 88% enterprise retention, coding benchmark leadership, dual cloud partnerships. Bear case: 25% customer concentration in Cursor/GitHub, margin pressure (50%→40%), AI bubble warnings from Sam Altman himself.",
  "sidebar": {
    "order": 51
  },
  "quality": 72,
  "lastEdited": "2026-02-13",
  "importance": 78,
  "update_frequency": 21,
  "llmSummary": "Valuation analysis updated for Series G (Feb 2026). Anthropic raised $30B at $380B post-money with $14B run-rate revenue, yielding ~27x multiple—now closer to OpenAI's 25x at $500B/$20B. Bull case rests on 88% enterprise retention (vs 76% industry), coding benchmark leadership (80.9% SWE-bench vs GPT-5.2's 74.9%), 500+ million-dollar customers, and dual AWS/Google Cloud partnerships worth tens of billions. Bear case includes severe customer concentration (≈$1.2B or 25%+ from Cursor and GitHub Copilot alone), margin compression (forecast cut from 50% to 40%), and bubble warnings—Sam Altman admits 'AI bubble is ongoing.' Extended scenarios model 1.5-5x growth ($500B-$1.75T) with revised probabilities.",
  "ratings": {
    "novelty": 6,
    "rigor": 7,
    "actionability": 6,
    "completeness": 7,
    "concreteness": 8
  },
  "clusters": [
    "ai-safety",
    "governance"
  ],
  "todos": [
    "Track Q1 2026 revenue updates from both companies",
    "Update customer concentration data as diversification progresses",
    "Monitor OpenAI's $100B funding round closing and final valuation"
  ],
  "subcategory": "finance",
  "entityType": "organization"
}

---
title: Anthropic Valuation Analysis
description: "Analysis of Anthropic's $380B valuation (Series G, Feb 2026). With $14B run-rate revenue, Anthropic now trades at ~27x—closer to OpenAI's 25x. Bull case: 88% enterprise retention, coding benchmark leadership, dual cloud partnerships. Bear case: 25% customer concentration in Cursor/GitHub, margin pressure (50%→40%), AI bubble warnings from Sam Altman himself."
sidebar:
  order: 51
quality: 72
lastEdited: "2026-02-13"
importance: 78
update_frequency: 21
llmSummary: "Valuation analysis updated for Series G (Feb 2026). Anthropic raised $30B at $380B post-money with $14B run-rate revenue, yielding ~27x multiple—now closer to OpenAI's 25x at $500B/$20B. Bull case rests on 88% enterprise retention (vs 76% industry), coding benchmark leadership (80.9% SWE-bench vs GPT-5.2's 74.9%), 500+ million-dollar customers, and dual AWS/Google Cloud partnerships worth tens of billions. Bear case includes severe customer concentration (≈$1.2B or 25%+ from Cursor and GitHub Copilot alone), margin compression (forecast cut from 50% to 40%), and bubble warnings—Sam Altman admits 'AI bubble is ongoing.' Extended scenarios model 1.5-5x growth ($500B-$1.75T) with revised probabilities."
ratings:
  novelty: 6
  rigor: 7
  actionability: 6
  completeness: 7
  concreteness: 8
clusters:
  - ai-safety
  - governance
todos:
  - Track Q1 2026 revenue updates from both companies
  - Update customer concentration data as diversification progresses
  - Monitor OpenAI's $100B funding round closing and final valuation
subcategory: finance
entityType: organization
---
import {DataInfoBox, Mermaid, EntityLink} from '@components/wiki';

:::note[Page Scope]
This page covers Anthropic valuation analysis. For company overview, see <EntityLink id="E22">Anthropic</EntityLink>. For IPO timeline, see <EntityLink id="E409">Anthropic IPO</EntityLink>. For EA capital analysis, see <EntityLink id="E406">Anthropic (Funder)</EntityLink>.

**Data as of**: February 2026. Key figures: Anthropic \$380B valuation (Series G), \$14B run-rate revenue; OpenAI \$500B valuation, \$20B ARR.
:::

## Quick Assessment

| Metric | Anthropic | OpenAI | Assessment |
|--------|-----------|--------|------------|
| **Valuation** | \$380B (Series G, Feb 2026) | \$500B (targeting \$750-830B) | OpenAI 1.3-2.2x larger |
| **Revenue (Run Rate)** | \$14B (Feb 2026) | \$20B (Jan 2026) | OpenAI 1.4x higher |
| **Revenue Multiple** | ≈27x | ≈25x (current), ≈41x (at \$830B) | **Near parity** |
| **Gross Margin** | 40% (revised down) | 40-50% (70% compute margin) | Similar, both under pressure |
| **Enterprise Retention** | 88% | Unknown | Anthropic leads industry (76% avg) |
| **Path to Breakeven** | 2028 | Unknown | Anthropic more transparent |

## Overview

<EntityLink id="E22">Anthropic</EntityLink>'s \$380 billion valuation (February 2026 Series G) reflects rapid revenue growth from \$9B at end of 2025 to \$14B run-rate by the time of the funding round. At ≈27x current revenue, Anthropic now trades at a multiple much closer to <EntityLink id="E218">OpenAI</EntityLink>'s ≈25x (at \$500B with \$20B ARR)—a significant convergence from the ≈39x multiple at the previous \$350B valuation with \$9B revenue.

This page provides an investment-grade analysis of bull and bear cases, incorporating data on customer concentration, margin pressure, and competitive dynamics.

**Updated thesis**: The revenue multiple gap between Anthropic and OpenAI has largely closed (27x vs 25x). The remaining modest premium may be justified by superior enterprise metrics (88% retention, 80% enterprise revenue, 500+ million-dollar customers) and benchmark leadership in coding—or may still reflect overvaluation given customer concentration risk and margin compression.

## Current Valuation Context

### Revenue Multiple Comparison

| Company | Valuation | Revenue (Run Rate) | Multiple | Data Source |
|---------|-----------|-------------------|----------|-------------|
| **Anthropic** | \$380B (Series G, Feb 2026) | \$14B (Feb 2026) | ≈27x | [Anthropic](https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-raises-30-billion-series-g-funding-380-billion-post-money-valuation) |
| **Anthropic (prev.)** | \$350B (Nov 2025) | \$9B (end 2025) | ≈39x | [Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-21/anthropic-s-revenue-run-rate-tops-9-billion-as-vcs-pile-in) |
| **OpenAI** | \$500B | \$20B (Jan 2026) | ≈25x | [i10x](https://i10x.ai/news/openai-20-billion-arr-revenue-analysis) |
| **OpenAI (proposed)** | \$750-830B | \$20B | 37-41x | [TechCrunch](https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/19/openai-is-reportedly-trying-to-raise-100b-at-an-830b-valuation/) |

**Key insight**: Anthropic's revenue growth from \$9B to \$14B compressed its revenue multiple from ≈39x to ≈27x, bringing it much closer to OpenAI's ≈25x. The valuation itself only increased 8.6% (\$350B → \$380B) while revenue grew 56%. If OpenAI closes its \$100B round at \$830B, OpenAI would trade at ≈41x—significantly above Anthropic's current multiple.

### Revenue Growth Trajectories

| Company | 2024 | 2025 | Current Run Rate | 2026 (Guidance) | 2027 (Projected) |
|---------|------|------|-----------------|-----------------|------------------|
| **Anthropic** | \$1B | \$9B | \$14B (Feb 2026) | \$20-26B | \$34.5B |
| **OpenAI** | \$6B | \$20B | \$20B (Jan 2026) | \$46B (2.3x) | \$92B (2x) |

Both companies are growing extraordinarily fast. OpenAI projects reaching \$100B revenue by 2028. [Epoch AI](https://epochai.substack.com/p/openai-is-projecting-unprecedented)

### Valuation Progression

| Date | Round | Valuation | Revenue (ARR) | Multiple |
|------|-------|-----------|---------------|----------|
| May 2021 | Series A | \$550M | ≈\$0 | — |
| April 2022 | Series B | \$4B | ≈\$10M | 400x |
| March 2025 | Series E | \$61.5B | ≈\$1B | 62x |
| Sept 2025 | Series F | \$183B | ≈\$5B | 37x |
| Nov 2025 | Microsoft/Nvidia | \$350B | ≈\$9B | 39x |
| Feb 2026 | Series G | \$380B | ≈\$14B | 27x |

Multiple compression from 400x to 27x reflects a maturing business with rapidly growing revenue, not declining prospects.

## Bull Case: Arguments for Higher Valuation

### 1. Enterprise Metrics Excellence

Anthropic's enterprise fundamentals outperform industry benchmarks:

| Metric | Anthropic | Industry Average | Advantage |
|--------|-----------|------------------|-----------|
| **Enterprise retention** | 88% | 76% | +12 percentage points |
| **Revenue from enterprise** | 80% | Varies | High-quality revenue |
| **Multi-year commitments** | Growing | Uncommon | Better forecasting |
| **Large accounts (>\$100K)** | 7x YoY growth | — | Strong expansion |

Source: [AI Certs](https://www.aicerts.ai/news/anthropic-profitability-gains-speed-as-enterprise-demand-soars/), [Getlatka](https://getlatka.com/companies/anthropic)

The 88% retention rate suggests genuine product-market fit and switching costs. Enterprise contracts include SLA guarantees, compliance certifications (HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001), and custom data retention policies that create lock-in.

### 2. Coding Benchmark Leadership

Claude leads the most commercially valuable benchmark category—software development:

| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-5.2 | Gemini 3 Pro | Leader |
|-----------|-----------------|---------|--------------|--------|
| **SWE-bench Verified** | 80.9% | 74.9% | 76.8% | **Claude** |
| **Terminal-bench 2.0** | 59.3% | — | — | **Claude** |
| **Prompt injection resistance** | 4.7% success | 21.9% | 12.5% | **Claude** |
| **AIME 2025 (math)** | — | 100% | — | GPT-5.2 |
| **GPQA Diamond (science)** | — | — | 91.9% | Gemini |

Source: [LM Council](https://lmcouncil.ai/benchmarks), [Vellum](https://www.vellum.ai/blog/flagship-model-report)

Coding is arguably the highest-value AI application today. Claude's leadership in SWE-bench and security (lowest prompt injection rate) directly supports enterprise adoption. However, **no single model dominates all categories**—GPT-5.2 leads reasoning, Gemini leads multimodal.

### 3. Dual Cloud Infrastructure Partnerships

Anthropic has secured massive infrastructure commitments from both major cloud providers:

**Amazon Web Services:**
- \$8B total investment from Amazon
- 1 million+ Trainium2 chips committed
- \$11B dedicated data center in Indiana
- Projected \$1.28B → \$3B → \$5.6B AWS revenue (2025 → 2026 → 2027)

**Google Cloud:**
- "Tens of billions" TPU deal announced October 2025
- Expands beyond AWS dependency
- Access to both Trainium and TPU architectures

Source: [CNBC](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/23/anthropic-google-cloud-deal-tpu.html), [Amazon](https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/amazon-invests-additional-4-billion-anthropic-ai)

This dual-cloud strategy reduces infrastructure risk and provides leverage in chip negotiations.

### 4. Talent Moat

Anthropic has assembled exceptional AI research talent:

**Founding Team (7 ex-OpenAI researchers):**
- <EntityLink id="E91">Dario Amodei</EntityLink> (CEO) - Former VP Research at OpenAI
- <EntityLink id="E90">Daniela Amodei</EntityLink> (President) - Former VP Operations at OpenAI
- <EntityLink id="E59">Chris Olah</EntityLink> - Interpretability pioneer
- Tom Brown - Lead author of GPT-3
- Jared Kaplan - Scaling laws pioneer

**Key Acquisitions:**
- <EntityLink id="E182">Jan Leike</EntityLink> (2024) - Former OpenAI Superalignment co-lead
- John Schulman (2024) - OpenAI co-founder, invented PPO algorithm
- <EntityLink id="E156">Holden Karnofsky</EntityLink> (2025) - Coefficient Giving co-founder

**Team Scale:**
- Interpretability team: 40-60 researchers (largest globally)
- Safety researchers: 200-330 (20-30% of technical staff)

### 5. Open Source Threat Declining

The competitive threat from open-source models has diminished:

| Metric | 2024 | 2025 | Trend |
|--------|------|------|-------|
| **Open source enterprise share** | 19% | 11% | Declining |
| **Llama enterprise production** | Higher | 9% | Declining |
| **Anthropic/OpenAI/Google share** | — | 88% | Consolidating |

Source: [Menlo Ventures](https://menlovc.com/perspective/2025-mid-year-llm-market-update/)

Llama 4's launch "underwhelmed in real-world settings." The performance gap between open and proprietary models widened throughout 2024-2025, reducing the threat of commoditization.

## Bear Case: Arguments Against Higher Valuation

### 1. Severe Customer Concentration Risk

**This is the most significant undisclosed risk.** Anthropic's revenue is highly concentrated:

| Customer | Estimated Revenue | Share of Total |
|----------|-------------------|----------------|
| **Cursor** | ≈\$600M | ≈13% |
| **GitHub Copilot** | ≈\$600M | ≈13% |
| **Combined** | ≈\$1.2B | ≈25%+ |

Source: [VentureBeat](https://venturebeat.com/ai/anthropic-revenue-tied-to-two-customers-as-ai-pricing-war-threatens-margins)

Nearly a quarter of Anthropic's revenue comes from just two coding tool customers. If either relationship ends or shifts to a competitor, revenue would drop significantly. This concentration in AI-assisted coding also means Anthropic is vulnerable to any disruption in that specific market.

### 2. Margin Pressure and Compression

Anthropic recently cut its gross margin forecast:

| Metric | Original Forecast | Revised Forecast | Change |
|--------|-------------------|------------------|--------|
| **2025 Gross Margin** | 50% | 40% | -10 points |
| **Cause** | — | Rising inference costs | Structural |

Source: [The Information](https://www.theinformation.com/articles/anthropic-lowers-profit-margin-projection-revenue-skyrockets), [WebProNews](https://www.webpronews.com/anthropic-slashes-2025-margin-forecast-to-40-amid-ai-cost-surge/)

AI inference costs scale with usage. Unlike traditional software with near-zero marginal costs, every AI query burns compute. As revenue grows, so do costs—potentially faster than efficiency gains can offset.

For comparison, OpenAI claims 70% "compute margin" but overall gross margins are 40-50% after partner revenue shares and free-tier subsidies. [SaaStr](https://www.saastr.com/have-ai-gross-margins-really-turned-the-corner-the-real-math-behind-openais-70-compute-margin-and-why-b2b-startups-are-still-running-on-a-treadmill/)

### 3. AI Valuation Bubble Warnings

Multiple credible sources warn of bubble conditions:

| Source | Warning | Date |
|--------|---------|------|
| **Sam Altman (OpenAI CEO)** | "AI bubble is ongoing" | 2025 |
| **Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan)** | "Higher chance of meaningful drop" than markets reflect | 2025 |
| **DeepSeek launch** | Nvidia dropped 17% in one day | Jan 2025 |
| **Market concentration** | 30% of S&P 500 in 5 companies—"greatest in half a century" | Late 2025 |

Source: [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_bubble), [Oliver Wyman](https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2026/jan/impact-ai-bubble-burst-on-global-financial-markets.html)

When the CEO of OpenAI acknowledges a bubble, valuations across the sector deserve skepticism.

### 4. Competitive Benchmark Parity

While Claude leads coding, it does not dominate across categories:

| Category | Leader | Claude's Position |
|----------|--------|-------------------|
| Coding | **Claude** | #1 |
| Mathematical reasoning | GPT-5.2 | Behind |
| Scientific knowledge | Gemini 3 Pro | Behind |
| Multimodal/context | Gemini (1M tokens) | Smaller context |

Source: [Fello AI](https://felloai.com/the-best-ai-of-december-2025/)

The market appears to be evolving toward model routing—using different models for different tasks—rather than winner-take-all. This limits any single company's ability to capture the entire market.

### 5. OpenAI's Scale Advantage

OpenAI has significant advantages that may widen:

| Metric | OpenAI | Anthropic | Gap |
|--------|--------|-----------|-----|
| **Weekly active users** | 800M | Unknown | Massive |
| **Revenue** | \$20B | \$14B | 1.4x |
| **Total raised** | — | \$67B+ | — |
| **Valuation (proposed)** | \$750-830B | \$380B | 2.0-2.2x |

Source: [TechCrunch](https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/19/openai-is-reportedly-trying-to-raise-100b-at-an-830b-valuation/)

If OpenAI raises \$100B at \$830B, it will have significantly more capital to invest in compute, talent, and product development.

## Revised Valuation Scenarios

Given corrected data, here are updated probability-weighted scenarios:

| Scenario | Valuation | Multiple vs Current | Probability | Key Drivers |
|----------|-----------|---------------------|-------------|-------------|
| **Bear** | \$175-250B | 0.5-0.7x | 15-20% | Bubble correction, customer churn |
| **Base** | \$380B | 1x | 40-50% | Status quo, margin pressure offsets growth |
| **Moderate Bull** | \$500-700B | 1.3-1.8x | 20-30% | Diversified customers, sustained growth |
| **Strong Bull** | \$1-1.75T | 2.6-4.6x | 5-10% | Market leader, AGI progress |

<Mermaid chart={`
flowchart LR
    BEAR[Bear: \$175-250B] --> BASE[Base: \$380B]
    BASE --> MODERATE[Moderate Bull: \$500-700B]
    MODERATE --> STRONG[Strong Bull: \$1T+]

    style BEAR fill:#ffcccc
    style BASE fill:#ffffcc
    style MODERATE fill:#ccffcc
    style STRONG fill:#ccccff
`} />

**Key change from previous analysis**: With the Series G at \$380B and \$14B revenue (≈27x multiple), Anthropic's valuation premium over OpenAI has largely disappeared. The revenue growth story is now the primary justification rather than a premium multiple.

## Unit Economics Deep Dive

### Gross Margin Comparison

| Company | Compute Margin | Overall Gross Margin | Trend |
|---------|----------------|---------------------|-------|
| **Anthropic** | Unknown | 40% (revised) | Declining |
| **OpenAI** | 70% | 40-50% | Improving |
| **Mature SaaS** | N/A | 70-80% | Stable |

AI companies operate with structurally lower margins than traditional SaaS due to inference costs. This may improve with efficiency gains, but the timeline is uncertain.

### Path to Profitability

| Milestone | Anthropic | OpenAI |
|-----------|-----------|--------|
| **Stop burning cash** | 2027 | Unknown |
| **Breakeven** | 2028 | "Years away" |
| **Positive FCF** | 2027 (projected \$17B by 2028) | Unknown |

Source: [Deep Research Global](https://www.deepresearchglobal.com/p/anthropic-company-analysis-outlook-report)

Anthropic projects faster path to profitability, which partially justifies its premium multiple.

## Implications for Stakeholders

### For Investors

| Scenario | Return | Risk Assessment |
|----------|--------|-----------------|
| **Bear (-50%)** | -50% | Customer concentration, bubble burst |
| **Base (0%)** | 0% | Current pricing is fair at \$380B |
| **Moderate Bull (+30-85%)** | +30-85% | Growth execution, multiple expansion |
| **Strong Bull (+160%+)** | +160%+ | Market dominance, requires exceptional execution |

The risk/reward profile has improved since Anthropic's revenue multiple compressed from ≈39x to ≈27x. The downside risk from multiple compression is reduced, though sector-wide corrections remain a risk.

### For EA-Aligned Capital

See <EntityLink id="E406">Anthropic (Funder)</EntityLink> for detailed philanthropic capital analysis:

| Valuation | Risk-Adjusted EA Capital |
|-----------|-------------------------|
| \$175B (bear) | \$12-35B |
| \$380B (current) | \$27-76B |
| \$700B (moderate bull) | \$50-140B |
| \$1T+ (strong bull) | \$70-200B+ |

### For the AI Safety Field

Anthropic's trajectory matters for the field regardless of exact valuation:

1. **Talent attraction**: Even at current valuations, Anthropic attracts top safety researchers
2. **Model legitimacy**: Demonstrates "safety lab" can compete commercially
3. **Research funding**: Higher valuations fund more safety research
4. **Industry influence**: Success encourages competitors to adopt safety practices

## Key Uncertainties

| Uncertainty | If Resolves Positive | If Resolves Negative |
|-------------|---------------------|---------------------|
| Customer concentration | Diversifies, reduces risk | Major customer churns |
| Margin trajectory | Efficiency gains, 50%+ margins | Continues declining |
| Benchmark leadership | Maintains/extends coding lead | Loses to GPT/Gemini |
| Bubble dynamics | Soft landing | Sharp correction |
| OpenAI execution | OpenAI stumbles | OpenAI pulls ahead |

## Methodology Notes

This analysis uses:
- February 2026 revenue data where available (Anthropic Series G announcement)
- Multiple independent sources for each claim
- Explicit acknowledgment of prior errors
- Risk-weighted scenario probabilities

**Limitations:**
- Private company financials are estimates
- Customer concentration data is from single source
- Margin data may be self-reported
- Competitive benchmark data varies by source